rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:30-33 doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.123471
  • Global issues

Incidence of occludable angles in a high-risk Mongolian population

  1. J L Y Yip1,2,
  2. P J Foster2,3,
  3. C E Gilbert1,
  4. D Uranchimeg4,
  5. J Bassanhuu4,
  6. P S Lee2,
  7. P T Khaw3,5,
  8. G J Johnson1,
  9. W Nolan6
  1. 1
    International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK
  2. 2
    Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK
  3. 3
    Glaucoma Research Unit, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK
  4. 4
    Department of Ophthalmology, Health Sciences University, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  5. 5
    Department of Pathology and Wound Healing, Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK
  6. 6
    Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Birmingham, UK
  1. W Nolan, Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Dudley Road, Birmingham B18 7QU, UK; winnie_nolan{at}yahoo.com
  • Accepted 28 August 2007

Abstract

Background: Primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) accounts for nearly 50% of global glaucoma blindness. There are currently no public health strategies to deal with this problem. Screening and prophylactic treatment of primary angle closure suspects (PACS) with laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) may form a feasible population-level intervention. However, more information about the natural history of PACS is required before such an approach could be considered.

Methods: Six hundred and forty-four participants aged 50 years with a central anterior chamber depth (cACD) of <2.53 mm underwent a full slit-lamp examination in 1999. Of these, 160 participants diagnosed as having occludable angles by gonioscopy (ISGEO classification) were excluded from all further analysis, leaving 484 for follow-up. Six years later, 95/484 (19.6%) had died. A total of 201 of 389 participants traced (51.7%) were re-examined. The potential risk factors for the development of an occludable angle were assessed using the chi squared test, t test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Results: At follow-up, 41 participants (20.4%, 95% CI: 14.8 to 25.7) were diagnosed as having incident PACS. Narrower angles, identified by grading of limbal chamber depth and gonioscopy at baseline, were strongly associated with incident occludable angles (p = 0.01 and p<0.01, respectively). There was weak evidence of an association with change in cACD (p = 0.05), and no evidence of an association with age, gender, and baseline cACD for the development of occludable angles.

Conclusions: Narrower angles as determined by limbal chamber depth grading and gonioscopy at baseline were the main risk factors identified for the development of occludable angles.

Footnotes

  • Funding: Wellcome Trust, Christian Blind Mission, British Council for Prevention of Blindness, National Lotteries board through Fight for Sight. The YAG laser used in the study was donated by Velux Foundation, Copenhagen.

  • Competing interests: None.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.