rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:1303 doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.141200
  • Editorial

Full or partial hypermetropic correction for accommodative esotropia: does it matter?

  1. Ken K Nischal
  1. Dr K K Nischal, Department of Ophthalmology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, UK; kkn{at}btinternet.com

    An understanding of accommodation, convergence, hypermetropia and their relationship to one another is crucial to the appropriate management of accommodative esotropia. Practically, however, the most important issue is how to manage the hypermetropic correction. Donders first described accommodative esotropia in the 19th century,1 so why then, almost 150 years later, does the question even arise as to the best way of correcting the hypermetropic refractive error associated with an accommodative esotropia?

    Perusal of the literature search engines gives part of the answer. There is a paucity of prospective studies2 in this area, and as previously suggested,3 those studies that have been published are difficult to compare because of a lack of detail as to how the initial hypermetropia was corrected. Details such as how cycloplegia was attained are important. It is worth remembering that cyclopentolate is far less effective at causing cycloplegia than atropine,4 so that “full” …

    Relevant Article

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.