rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:170-174 doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.122192
  • Global issues

Using assessment of willingness to pay to improve a Cambodian spectacle service

  1. J Ramke1,2,3,
  2. A Palagyi1,2,3,
  3. R du Toit1,2,3,
  4. G Brian1,2,3
  1. 1
    The Fred Hollows Foundation (New Zealand), Auckland, New Zealand
  2. 2
    The International Centre for Eyecare Education (ICEE), Sydney, Australia
  3. 3
    The Vision Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
  1. G Brian, 5 Hazelmere Parade, Sherwood 4075, Australia; grbrian{at}tpg.com.au
  • Accepted 4 November 2007
  • Published Online First 22 January 2008

Abstract

Aims: To assess willingness to pay for spectacles in provincial Cambodia, and use this to inform creation of a financially self-sustaining spectacle scheme within a blindness prevention programme.

Methods: An interview-based questionnaire was used to elicit willingness to pay for spectacles of all people dispensed spectacles during an outreach refraction service visit to three village health centres in Cambodia.

Results: Of 293 people participating in the study, 252 (86%) provided internally valid willingness-to-pay responses from which data were analysed. 76.6% (193) were willing to pay at least KHR1500 (US$0.38) for spectacles. On multivariate analysis, an increased likelihood of being unwilling to pay at least KHR1500 for spectacles in the future was significantly and independently associated with being ≥60 years old, attending Kor or Svay Teap health centres, not being an income earner in the household and having a household monthly income of less than KHR50 000. There was no association with being vision-impaired, this being the first eye examination, occupation, not having motorised transport or previous spectacle wear. If the potential willingness to pay had been converted to actual on the day, there would have been a 28.0% increase in revenue, and a greater than fivefold increase in profit, for the spectacle scheme.

Conclusions: Willingness-to-pay data may be useful for price-setting and developing a subsidisation protocol for poorer consumers that will ensure financial accessibility for all and financial sustainability for the provision of spectacles.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Funding: This work was in part financially supported by the Australian Federal government through the Co-operative Research Centres Program (Vision CRC).

  • Patient consent: Written informed consent (or verbal consent if there were literacy barriers) was obtained from each participant.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF
  4. All versions of this article:
    1. bjo.2007.122192v1
    2. 92/2/170 most recent

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.