rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:585
  • At a glance

At a glance

Macular pseudoholes and lamellar holes

Differentiation between macular pseudoholes and lamellar holes can be difficult. 50 eyes of 46 consecutive patients diagnosed by OCT as having a foveal defect with residual retinal tissue were reviewed. Eyes classified as having pseudoholes (28) had macular centres and perifoveal retinas significantly thicker than the 22 eyes with lamellar macular holes. The corresponding corrected autofluorescence (AF) images were then evaluated. None of the control eyes showed foveal AF. Bottoni et al observed that AF imaging is superior to OCT data when differentiating between macular pseudoholes and lamellar holes, as presence of foveal AF is indicative of foveal tissue loss and, therefore, is diagnostic of a lamellar macular hole.

See pages 635

Autofluorescence of choroidal melanoma

Shields et al …

Relevant Articles

This Article

Services

  1. Request permissions

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Social bookmarking

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for BJO. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.