Article Text

PDF
The effect of comorbidities upon ocular and systemic health-related quality of life
  1. F J Real1,
  2. G C Brown1,2,3,4,
  3. H C Brown1,
  4. M M Brown1,3,4,5
  1. 1
    Center for Value-Based Medicine, Flourtown, PA, USA
  2. 2
    Retina Service, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  3. 3
    Wills Eye Hospital, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Eye Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  4. 4
    Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  5. 5
    University of Pennsylvania, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  1. Professor G C Brown, Center for Value-Based Medicine, Box 335, Flourtown, PA 19031, USA; gbrown{at}valuebasedmedicine.com

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of the study was to assess whether, and to what degree, comorbidities affect patient quality of life.

Methods: A cross-sectional, quality-of-life study of 170 consecutive vitreoretinal patients compared the utility associated with a participant’s primary (most incapacitating) disease and the utility associated with a grouping of all of the participants’ diseases. The ocular diseases present included diabetic retinopathy (44%), macular degeneration (30%), lattice degeneration/retinal tear (14%), retinal vascular obstruction (5%), uveitis, macular oedema, macular pucker (5%) and others (2%). Participants underwent interviewer-administered, time trade-off utility questions for each disease, then for a compilation of all diseases. Their primary disease was defined by the lowest utility reported for a single disease, while other health conditions were considered comorbidities. A two-tailed, paired t test was used to compare the means of the primary disease utilities and compilation utilities. The study was powered to have a 90% chance of detecting an 8% difference in mean utility between the two utility groups

Results: The mean lowest utility for the most disabling single health condition (primary disease) was 0.82 (SD 0.22; 95% CI 0.79 to 0.85. The mean utility for the grouping together of all diseases was 0.80 (SD 0.24, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.84). No significant difference was found between the mean utilities of the two groups (p = 0.56).

Conclusions: The overall health-related quality of life of a patient in an ophthalmic population with serious diseases appears to be primarily determined by the single disease that most adversely affects the individual’s quality of life. This conclusion has significant implications in clinical care and when considering the use of comorbidities in cost–utility analyses.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding: The Center for Value-Based Medicine, Flourtown, PA, and the Eye Research Institute (ERI), Philadelphia, PA funded the study. Neither organisation had any role in the design and conduct of the study, collection and interpretation of the data, or preparation and approval of the manuscript.

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Patient consent: Patient consent was obtained.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.