rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:120-122 doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.146514
  • Innovations

Interference microscopy delineates cellular proliferations on flat mounted internal limiting membrane specimens

  1. A Gandorfer,
  2. R Scheler,
  3. R Schumann,
  4. C Haritoglou,
  5. A Kampik
  1. University Eye Hospital Munich, Germany
  1. Dr A Gandorfer, Vitreoretinal and Pathology Unit, University Eye Hospital Munich, Mathildenstr. 8, 80336 Munich, Germany; arnd.gandorfer{at}med.uni-muenchen.de
  • Accepted 13 August 2008

Abstract

Aim: To demonstrate that interference microscopy of flat mounted internal limiting membrane specimens clearly delineates cellular proliferations at the vitreomacular interface.

Methods: ILM specimens harvested during vitrectomy were fixed in glutaraldehyde 0.05% and paraformaldehyde 2% for 24 h (pH 7.4). In addition to interference microscopy, immunocytochemistry using antibodies against glial fibrillar acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament (NF) was performed. After washing in phosphate-buffered saline 0.1 M, the specimens were flat-mounted on glass slides without sectioning, embedding or any other technique of conventional light microscopy. A cover slide and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) medium were added to stain the cell nuclei.

Results: Interference microscopy clearly delineates cellular proliferations at the ILM. DAPI stained the cell nuclei. Areas of cellular proliferation can be easily distinguished from ILM areas without cells. Immunocytochemistry can be performed without changing the protocols used in conventional microscopy.

Conclusion: Interference microscopy of flat mounted ILM specimens gives new insights into the distribution of cellular proliferations at the vitreomacular interface and allows for determination of the cell density at the ILM. Given that the entire ILM peeled is seen en face, the techniques described offer a more reliable method to investigate the vitreoretinal interface in terms of cellular distribution compared with conventional microscopy.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethics approval: Ethics approval was provided by Ethikkommission der LMU München.

  • Patient consent: Obtained.

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for BJO. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.