rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:52-55 doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.148072
  • Original Article
    • Clinical science

Use of optomap for retinal screening within an eye casualty setting

  1. S Khandhadia1,
  2. K C Madhusudhana2,
  3. A Kostakou3,
  4. J V Forrester4,
  5. R S B Newsom1
  1. 1
    Southampton Eye Unit, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
  2. 2
    Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, UK
  3. 3
    Ophthalmiatrio Eye Hospital, Athens, Greece
  4. 4
    Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK
  1. Mr R S B Newsom, Southampton Eye Unit, Tremona Road, Southampton S016 6YD, UK; richard.newsom{at}suht.swest.nhs.uk
  • Accepted 12 October 2008
  • Published Online First 29 October 2008

Abstract

Aim: To compare nurse-guided Optomap retinal imaging with examination by an eye casualty officer, in detecting clinically significant peripheral retinal lesions in patients with retinal symptoms.

Methods: 219 patients presenting to eye casualty with retinal symptoms (flashing lights and floaters) were recruited. Retinal images were taken with the Optomap imaging system, and graded by an independent masked ophthalmologist. The findings from the Optomap and casualty officer were compared with a gold-standard examination with scleral indentation performed by a retinal specialist. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the Optomap and casualty officer.

Results: The final analysis included 205 eyes of 187 patients. The sensitivity of the Optomap for detecting retinal detachment (n = 7) was 100% (95% CI 59–100%), the same as the casualty officer. For retinal holes/tears (n = 18) the Optomap sensitivity was 33% (13–59%), compared with 67% (41–87%) for the casualty officer. Combining all retinal lesions (n = 52), the sensitivity was 62% (47–75%) and 73% (59–84%), with specificity 96% (92–99%) and 98% (94–100%) for the Optomap and casualty officer respectively.

Conclusion: The Optomap detects retinal detachments successfully but, due to limitations in the optics, is not able to accurately detect retinal holes and tears.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Funding: This project was funded by a grant from Optos, Dunfermline, Scotland. Data collection, analysis and manuscript writing were conducted independently of Optos.

  • Patient consent: Obtained.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF
  4. All Versions of this Article:
    1. bjo.2008.148072v1
    2. 93/1/52 most recent

Services

  1. Email this link to a friend
  2. Alert me when this article is cited
  3. Alert me if a correction is posted
  4. Alert me when eletters are published
  5. Article Usage Statistics
  6. Similar articles in this journal
  7. Similar articles in Web of Science
  8. Similar articles in PubMed
  9. Add article to my folders
  10. Download to citation manager
  11. Request permissions

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Social bookmarking

Register for free content


Free sample
 This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for BJO. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.