Intravitreal injection of pegaptanib sodium for proliferative diabetic retinopathy
- Correspondence to Dr V H González, Valley Retina Institute, PA, 1309 East Ridge Road, Suite 1, McAllen, TX 78503, USA; research{at}vritx.com
- Received 5 December 2008
- Published Online First 18 August 2009
Abstract
Background: To compare the efficacy of intravitreal pegaptanib (IVP) with panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) in the treatment of active proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).
Methods: A prospective, randomised, controlled, open-label, exploratory study. Twenty subjects with active PDR were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive treatment in one eye either with IVP (0.3 mg) every 6 weeks for 30 weeks or with PRP laser. Efficacy endpoints included regression of retinal neovascularisation (NV), changes from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and foveal thickness. Safety outcomes included observed and reported adverse events.
Results: In 90% of randomised eyes to IVP, retinal NV showed regression by week 3. By week 12, all IVP eyes were completely regressed and maintained through week 36. In the PRP-treated group, at week 36, two eyes demonstrated complete regression, two showed partial regression, and four showed persistent active PDR. The mean change in BCVA at 36 weeks was +5.8 letters in pegaptanib-treated eyes and −6.0 letters in PRP-treated eyes. Only mild to moderate transient ocular adverse events were reported with pegaptanib.
Conclusions: IVP produces short-term marked and rapid regression of diabetic retinal NV. Regression of NV was maintained throughout the study and at the final visit.
Footnotes
-
Funding This study was supported by a grant from Pfizer, New York and (OSI) Eyetech, New York.
-
Competing interests VHG is a paid consultant and speaker for (OSI) Eyetech Pharmaceuticals.
-
Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
-
Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by Sterling Institutional Review Board.
-
Patient consent Obtained.







