rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:1488-1491 doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.153189
  • Original Article
  • Clinical science

Predicting visual success in macular hole surgery

  1. B Gupta1,
  2. D A H Laidlaw1,
  3. T H Williamson1,
  4. S P Shah2,
  5. R Wong1,
  6. S Wren1
  1. 1
    Department of Ophthalmology, St Thomas’s Hospital, London, UK
  2. 2
    International Centre for Eye Health, Clinical Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Mr D A H Laidlaw, Department of Ophthalmology, St Thomas’s Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK; Alistair.Laidlaw{at}gstt.nhs.uk
  • Accepted 7 May 2009
  • Published Online First 26 July 2009

Abstract

Aim: Data on the outcome of surgery facilitate informed preoperative patient counselling. Most studies on the outcome of surgery for idiopathic full thickness macular hole surgery have concentrated on rates of anatomical closure. The aim of this study was to identify factors predicting visual success (better than 20/40; 6/12 Snellen) following macular hole surgery.

Methods: A retrospective study of 133 patients undergoing standardised macular hole surgery with at least 3 months of postoperative follow-up. All patients underwent preoperative measurement of the maximum macular hole diameter using optical coherence tomography.

Results: Multivariable regression analysis identified that age, preoperative visual acuity and macular hole size were significant predictors of visual success. The resulting model correctly classified the visual outcome of 80% of cases. Predicted rates of visual success varied from 93% in patients <60 years old with visual acuity better than 6/24 and a hole diameter of <350 μm, to 2% in patients those >79 years old with visual acuity of 6/60 or worse and hole diameter of >500 μm.

Conclusion: The results provide a simple and clinically useful model to employ when counselling patients on macular hole surgery.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Ethics approval Obtained

Relevant Article

  • At a glance:At a glance Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:idoi:10.1136/bjo.2009.173393

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF
  4. All versions of this article:
    1. bjo.2008.153189v1
    2. 93/11/1488 most recent

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.