rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:322-328 doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.136739
  • Clinical science
    • Original Article

Detection of visual-field deterioration by Glaucoma Progression Analysis and Threshold Noiseless Trend programs

  1. V T Diaz-Aleman1,
  2. A Anton2,
  3. M Gonzalez de la Rosa1,
  4. Z K Johnson3,
  5. S McLeod4,
  6. A Azuara-Blanco5
  1. 1
    Hospital Universitario de Canarias, La Laguna, Spain
  2. 2
    Institut Catala de Retina and Hospital de la Esperanza y el Mar, Barcelona, Spain
  3. 3
    Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
  4. 4
    Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, UK
  5. 5
    Grampian University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
  1. Dr A Azuara-Blanco, The Eye Clinic, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, UK; aazblanco{at}aol.com
  • Accepted 25 June 2008
  • Published Online First 11 July 2008

Abstract

Background: To compare the ability of Glaucoma Progression Analysis (GPA) and Threshold Noiseless Trend (TNT) programs to detect visual-field deterioration.

Methods: Patients with open-angle glaucoma followed for a minimum of 2 years and a minimum of seven reliable visual fields were included. Progression was assessed subjectively by four masked glaucoma experts, and compared with GPA and TNT results. Each case was judged to be stable, deteriorated or suspicious of deterioration

Results: A total of 56 eyes of 42 patients were followed with a mean of 7.8 (SD 1.0) tests over an average of 5.5 (1.04) years. Interobserver agreement to detect progression was good (mean kappa = 0.57). Progression was detected in 10–19 eyes by the experts, in six by GPA and in 24 by TNT. Using the consensus expert opinion as the gold standard (four clinicians detected progression), the GPA sensitivity and specificity were 75% and 83%, respectively, while the TNT sensitivity and specificity was 100% and 77%, respectively.

Conclusion: TNT showed greater concordance with the experts than GPA in the detection of visual-field deterioration. GPA showed a high specificity but lower sensitivity, mainly detecting cases of high focality and pronounced mean defect slopes.

Footnotes

  • Funding: Supported in part by FEDER foundation and Fondo de Investigation Sanitaria (FIS), Instituto Carlos III, Ministerio de Sanidad and Consumo, Spain.

  • Competing interests: MGR has commercial interest in one of the software packages used in this study, Threshold Noiseless Trend (TNT).

  • Patient consent:Obtained.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF
  4. All Versions of this Article:
    1. bjo.2007.136739v1
    2. bjo.2007.136739v2
    3. 93/3/322 most recent

Services

  1. Email this link to a friend
  2. Alert me when this article is cited
  3. Alert me if a correction is posted
  4. Alert me when eletters are published
  5. Article Usage Statistics
  6. Similar articles in this journal
  7. Similar articles in Web of Science
  8. Similar articles in PubMed
  9. Add article to my folders
  10. Download to citation manager
  11. Request permissions

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Social bookmarking

Register for free content


Free sample
 This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for BJO. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.