rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:435-438 doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.144329
  • Global issues

Novel optometrist-led all Wales primary eye-care services: evaluation of a prospective case series

  1. N J L Sheen1,
  2. D Fone2,
  3. C J Phillips3,
  4. J M Sparrow4,
  5. J S Pointer5,
  6. J M Wild1
  1. 1
    Cardiff School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Maindy Road, Cardiff, UK
  2. 2
    Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK
  3. 3
    Institute for Health Research, School of Health Science, Swansea, University, Singleton Park, Swansea, UK
  4. 4
    Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, UK
  5. 5
    Optometric Research, Higham Ferrers, UK
  1. Dr N J L Sheen, Cardiff School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Maindy Road, Cardiff CF24 4LU, UK; sheennj{at}cardiff.ac.uk
  • Accepted 3 November 2008
  • Published Online First 21 November 2008

Abstract

Aims: To derive an evidence base for the efficacy of two novel optometric primary eye care services in Wales, the Primary Eyecare Acute Referral Scheme (PEARS) and the Welsh Eye Health Examination (WEHE).

Methods: A Donabedian model using structure, process and outcome was applied to evaluate prospectively 6432 individuals attending 274 optometrists within an 8-month period. Telephone interviews and review of optometric and hospital notes were used to determine management appropriateness for patients either managed in optometric practice or referred to the Hospital Eye Service (HES). A Geographic Information Systems analysis determined distances travelled to the optometrist. A cost analysis was used to determine the net cost of the schemes.

Results: 4243 (66%) of the 6432 individuals were managed in optometric practice; inappropriate management was apparent in 1% of individuals. 392 hospital notes were reviewed; 75% exhibited appropriate optometric referrals to the HES. 87% of individuals travelled less than 5 miles to attend an optometrist. The net cost of a PEARS/WEHE consultation was a minimum of £12.

Conclusions: Optometric management within the schemes is acceptable. Good equity of access was achieved at a relatively low net cost per consultation. Agreement on protocols for referral to the HES would enhance the schemes.

Footnotes

  • Funding: Funded by the Welsh Assembly Government. The funder had no involvement with the research.

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethics approval: Ethics approval was provided by the Multi Centre Research Ethics Committee for Wales.

  • Patient consent: Obtained.

Responses to this article

This Article

  1. All Versions of this Article:
    1. bjo.2008.144329v1
    2. 93/4/435 most recent

Services

  1. Request permissions

Social bookmarking

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for BJO. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.