Article Text

PDF
Outcome of cataract surgery at one year in Kenya, the Philippines and Bangladesh
  1. R Lindfield1,
  2. H Kuper1,
  3. S Polack1,
  4. C Eusebio2,
  5. W Mathenge1,3,
  6. Z Wadud4,
  7. A M Rashid5,
  8. A Foster1
  1. 1
    International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  2. 2
    Cataract Foundation of the Philippines, Bacolod, Philippines
  3. 3
    Rift Valley Provincial Hospital, Nakuru, Kenya
  4. 4
    Child Sight Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  5. 5
    CHER Foundation, Khulna, Bangladesh
  1. Dr R Lindfield, International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; robert.lindfield{at}lshtm.ac.uk

Abstract

Aims: To assess the change in vision following cataract surgery in Kenya, Bangladesh and the Philippines and to identify causes and predictors of poor outcome.

Methods: Cases were identified through surveys, outreach and clinics. They underwent preoperative visual acuity measurement and ophthalmic examination. Cases were re-examined 8–15 months after cataract surgery. Information on age, gender, poverty and literacy was collected at baseline.

Results: 452 eyes of 346 people underwent surgery. 124 (27%) eyes had an adverse outcome. In Kenya and the Philippines, the main cause of adverse outcome was refractive error (37% and 49% respectively of all adverse outcomes) then comorbid ocular disease (26% and 27%). In Bangladesh, this was comorbid disease (58%) then surgical complications (21%). There was no significant association between adverse outcome and gender, age, literacy, poverty or preoperative visual acuity.

Conclusions: Adverse outcomes following cataract surgery were frequent in the three countries. Main causes were refractive error and preoperative comorbidities. Many patients are not attaining the outcomes available with modern surgery. Focus should be on correcting refractive error, through operative techniques or postoperative refraction, and on a system for assessing comorbidities and communicating risk to patients. These are only achievable with a commitment to ongoing surgical audit.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Funding: This project was jointly funded by Sight Savers International, Orbis International and Christian Blind Mission.

  • Ethics approval: Ethics approval was provided by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Kenya Medical Research Institute, the University of St. La Salle (Bacolod, Philippines) and the Bangladesh Medical Research Council.

  • Patient consent: Obtained.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.