rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:1089-1095 doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.152181
  • Original Article
  • Laboratory science

New test for the diagnosis of bacterial endophthalmitis

  1. P Goldschmidt1,
  2. S Degorge1,
  3. D Benallaoua1,
  4. E Basli2,
  5. L Batellier1,
  6. S Boutboul2,
  7. C Allouch2,
  8. V Borderie2,
  9. L Laroche2,
  10. C Chaumeil1
  1. 1
    Laboratoire du Centre National d’Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, 28 rue de Charenton, Paris, France
  2. 2
    Service 5 du Centre National d’Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, 28 rue de Charenton, Paris, France
  1. Correspondence to Dr P Goldschmidt, Laboratoire du Centre National d’Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, 28 rue de Charenton, 75012 Paris France; pablogol{at}aol.com; goldschmidt{at}quinze-vingts.fr
  • Accepted 30 January 2009
  • Published Online First 10 February 2009

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of bacterial endophthalmitis (BE) often fails due to: (1) insufficient volumes of vitreous fluid (VF) and aqueous humour (AH); (2) lack of sensitivity of culture; (3) antibiotic treatments; (4) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cross-contamination; and (5) limitations on the interpretation of the real-time PCR melting curve. We developed a fast real-time (f-real-t) PCR to improve the performance of the laboratory diagnosis of BE.

Methods: The following samples were processed after adding an internal control: phosphate buffered saline (PBS); VF, AH and cell suspensions spiked with Bacteria (Bac); VF and AH from patients with endophthalmitis; and VF and AH from non-infective patients. DNA was extracted (MagNA Pure®) and added to four tubes containing selected primers and probes for the identification and quantification of all Bac and eight genera by f-real-t PCR. Diagnostic performances based on direct microscopic examination, culture and f-real-t PCR were compared.

Results: The f-real-t PCR detected at least 0.01 colony-forming units (CFU) of Bac/μl with no cross-reactivity with fungi. Correlation with culture-positive results was 100%. Sixty per cent of BE samples tested culture-positive, but f-real-t PCR tested positive for 90%. Samples from non-infective cases were negative.

Conclusion: The f-real-t PCR detected and quantified Bac, Staphylococci, Streptococci, Haemophilus, Pseudomonas, Enterobacteria, Acinetobacter, Propionibacteriacae and Corynebacteria in one run. Cultures required several hours to days (with a non-negligible number of false-negative results) and the f-real-t PCR was completed in 90 min. The f-real-t PCR is presented as a new tool for the diagnosis of BE: its usefulness requires validation with larger series of samples.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None

  • Ethics approval Investigations were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (http://www.wma.net/e/policy/).

Relevant Article

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.