Article Text

PDF
Clinical science
Relationship between glaucoma and selenium levels in plasma and aqueous humour
  1. R L Bruhn1,
  2. W D Stamer2,3,
  3. L A Herrygers3,
  4. J M Levine3,
  5. R J Noecker3
  1. 1
    Department of Epidemiology, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
  2. 2
    Department of Pharmacology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
  3. 3
    Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr R J Noecker, 203 Lothrop Street, Suite 828, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; noeckerrj{at}upmc.edu

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to compare selenium levels in plasma and aqueous humour in subjects with and without primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

Methods: Forty-seven POAG cases and 54 controls in this case–control study were recruited from surgery patients at the University Physician’s Ophthalmology Clinic in Tucson, Arizona, USA. Aqueous humour and plasma selenium were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography ion channel plasma mass spectrometry (HPLC ICP-MS). Potential confounders were assessed via a questionnaire. Biological samples were collected and processed at surgery and analysed for selenium content after collection was complete. Outcome measures included the odds of glaucoma in relationship to plasma selenium, aqueous humour selenium, and the ratio of levels of aqueous humour selenium to plasma selenium.

Results: Tertile of selenium and its relationship to POAG was examined. After adjustment for common glaucoma risk factors, the odds of glaucoma in the highest tertile of plasma selenium (OR = 11.3; p = 0.03) and the middle tertile of aqueous humour selenium (OR = 0.06; p = 0.02) was significantly associated with glaucoma.

Conclusion: Although a causal pathway cannot be inferred from our analysis, our data, added to that of others, suggest that the pathology is selenium-related.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding This study was supported in part by Research to Prevent Blindness Foundation and National Eye Institute (EY15115). R J N had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • See Editorial, p 1132

  • Ethics approval The study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Human Subjects Committee at the University of Arizona.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles