Aim To use en face optical coherence tomographic (OCT) imaging to identify features of tumour tissue and their correlation with histopathologic findings and to assess the effect of different wavelengths and resolutions of OCT in identifying tumour boundaries and features.
Methods Excision specimens of consecutive biopsy-proven periocular basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) (n=8) were assessed by OCT, performing in vitro cross-section and en face scans of the tissues. Images were collected from three different machines: systems 1 and 2 had a wavelength of 1300 nm, and system 3 had a wavelength of 840 nm. System 2 used high numerical aperture interface optics that determines higher magnification and hence allows higher transversal resolution. All the eight specimens subsequently underwent routine histopathologic examination.
Results Three common features of tumour tissue were observed in all the three systems: (1) lobular pattern of abnormal architecture, (2) dilated blood vessels and (3) high reflective margins. We compared the three systems based on their ability to pick up the three above-mentioned tumour features. In this respect, system 2 had the highest capability in picking up feature 1, followed by systems 1 and 3. In feature 2, similar results were obtained with all the three systems. System 3 was unable to pick up feature 3, whereas systems 1 and 2 performed equally.
Conclusion En face OCT imaging has the potential to identify tumour tissue from healthy tissue. It also showed correlation with corresponding histopathologic findings. Non-contact OCT imaging of the skin is a non-invasive and convenient method and can be useful for demarcating BCCs on the face and eyelids. Future larger studies on in vivo BCCs using en face ultra-high–resolution OCT should provide information on subtyping BCCs.
- basal cell
- optical coherence tomography
- diagnostic tests/investigation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Competing interests AP acted as consultant for and has patents with Ophthalmic Technology Inc, Canada, and University of Kent.
Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the ethics committee of the Faculty of Science, Technology and Medical Studies, University of Kent, and the West Kent Ethics Committee.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.