Article Text

PDF
Postoperative infection in penetrating versus non-penetrating glaucoma surgery
  1. Ghee Soon Ang,
  2. Zsolt Varga,
  3. Tarek Shaarawy
  1. Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
  1. Correspondence to Dr Tarek Shaarawy, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Geneva, 22 rue Alcide Jentzer, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland; tarek.shaarawy{at}hcuge.ch

Abstract

The aim of glaucoma surgery is to lower the intraocular pressure in order to reduce the risk of further glaucomatous progression, particularly in cases refractory to topical therapy. Although effective in reducing intraocular pressure, these procedures are not without complications, with endophthalmitis being one of the most serious. A PubMed review of the literature was performed for trabeculectomy, glaucoma drainage device procedures (Ahmed, Baerveldt and Molteno implants) and non-penetrating glaucoma surgery (deep sclerectomy and viscocanalostomy) for reports of postoperative infection, including blebitis and endophthalmitis. The literature on infections relating to non-penetrating glaucoma surgery is sparse compared with penetrating surgery, but this may be a reflection of the relatively shorter follow-up duration and comparatively smaller body of data available on non-penetrating procedures. Overall, there is not enough evidence, in terms of well-constructed randomised clinical trials with sufficiently large sample sizes and long follow-up durations, to be able to make informed comparisons of the risk of postoperative endophthalmitis and infection between the various glaucoma operations. This review article summarises the incidences of endophthalmitis from the literature and discusses the major risk factors for postoperative infection.

  • Non-penetrating glaucoma surgery
  • deep sclerectomy
  • viscocanalostomy
  • trabeculectomy
  • glaucoma drainage device
  • blebitis
  • endophthalmitis
  • mitomycin-c
  • 5-fluorouracil
  • intraocular pressure
  • infection
  • treatment surgery

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding Cheltenham Ophthalmology Scholarship (GSA).

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.