rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94:174-179 doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.155531
  • Clinical science

A randomised trial of bevacizumab and reduced light dose photodynamic therapy in age-related macular degeneration: the VIA study

  1. M J Potter,
  2. C C Claudio,
  3. S M Szabo
  1. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2550 Willow Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 3N9
  1. Correspondence to Dr M J Potter, VH/UBC Eye Care Centre, 2550 Willow St—Section B, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 3N9; michael.potter88{at}gmail.com
  • Accepted 20 February 2009
  • Published Online First 10 June 2009

Abstract

Aim To determine if reduced light-dose photodynamic therapy (PDT) combined with bevacizumab will decrease the number of bevacizumab treatments required over 6 months compared with bevacizumab monotherapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Methods Thirty-six patients with neovascular AMD were recruited for this randomised, double-masked, controlled clinical trial. Patients received intravitreal bevacizumab plus PDT using a light dose of either 25 J/cm2 (group 1) or 12 J/cm2 (group 2), or intravitreal bevacizumab plus sham PDT (group 3). Patients returned monthly for possible retreatment with bevacizumab or combination therapy (with a 3-month minimum interval between combination treatments); retreatment decisions were primarily based on optical coherence tomography. The main outcome measure was the mean number of bevacizumab treatments required over 6 months.

Results Patients required a mean of 2.8 bevacizumab treatments in group 1 and 2.5 in group 2, compared with 5.1 in group 3 (p = 0.005 and p<0.001, respectively).

Conclusions Combination bevacizumab and 25 J/cm2 or 12 J/cm2 PDT significantly reduced the number of bevacizumab treatments required over 6 months. This study was powered to examine number of treatments, but not visual acuities. Nevertheless, visual acuities responded favourably in all three groups. Further studies will be helpful to explore visual outcomes.

Footnotes

  • See Editorial, p 143

  • Funding This study was an investigator-initiated trial sponsored by QLT, Vancouver, Canada. The sponsor of this study had no role in the design; collection, analysis or interpretation of data; manuscript writing; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

  • Competing interests MJP has received consulting fees from Novartis, and he has received grant support from QLT, Allergan and Regeneron.

  • Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by the institutional review boards of the University of British Columbia and the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Relevant Articles

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for BJO. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.