Article Text

PDF
Levator function revisited: a two-phase assessment of lid movement to better identify levator–superior rectus synkinesis
  1. Carole A Jones1,
  2. Edward J Lee1,
  3. John M Sparrow2,3,
  4. Richard A Harrad2
  1. 1Eye Ear and Mouth Unit, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Kent, UK
  2. 2Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, UK
  3. 3International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Miss Carole A Jones, Eye Ear and Mouth Unit, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Hermitage Lane Maidstone, Kent ME16 9QQ, UK; ophthcaj{at}aol.com

Abstract

Aim To assess a two-phase method of recording levator function in order to facilitate the identification of patients with ptosis who have a synkinesis between the levator and superior rectus muscles.

Methods 40 consecutive patients who attended oculoplastic clinics with ptosis and 22 patients with normal lid function were recruited. In each subject, levator function was recorded by the conventional method, measuring total upper eyelid excursion between the extremes of down-gaze and up-gaze. Levator function was also assessed using our novel two-phase approach in which upper-eyelid excursion is measured separately between down-gaze and primary position (Phase 1), and between primary position and up-gaze (Phase 2).

Results In normal patients and most of the patients with ptosis, the majority of lid movement and hence levator function occurs between down-gaze and the primary position (Phase1). In those patients with ptosis and levator–superior rectus synkinesis, a higher proportion of lid movement occurred on up-gaze (Phase2).

Conclusion The two-phase measurement of lid movement highlights levator function in differing gaze positions and facilitates the identification of those patients with levator–superior rectus synkinesis.

  • Assessment
  • eyelids
  • ptosis
  • synkinesis
  • diagnostic tests/investigation

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by the Cambridgeshire 4 Research Ethics Committee.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.