Article Text

PDF
The variation in transparency of amniotic membrane used in ocular surface regeneration
  1. C J Connon1,
  2. J Doutch2,
  3. B Chen1,
  4. A Hopkinson3,
  5. J S Mehta4,
  6. T Nakamura5,
  7. S Kinoshita5,
  8. K M Meek2
  1. 1School of Pharmacy, University of Reading, Reading, UK
  2. 2School of Optometry & Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
  3. 3Division of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
  4. 4Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore
  5. 5Department of Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
  1. Correspondence to Dr C J Connon, School of Pharmacy, University of Reading, Rm 108, Hopkins Building Whiteknights, PO Box 228, Reading RG6 6UB, UK; c.j.connon{at}reading.ac.uk

Abstract

Background/aims Scant consideration has been given to the variation in structure of the human amniotic membrane (AM) at source or to the significance such differences might have on its clinical transparency. Therefore, we applied our experience of quantifying corneal transparency to AM.

Methods Following elective caesarean, AM from areas of the fetal sac distal and proximal (ie, adjacent) to the placenta was compared with freeze-dried AM. The transmission of light through the AM samples was quantified spectrophotometrically; also, tissue thickness was measured by light microscopy and refractive index by refractometry.

Results Freeze-dried and freeze-thawed AM samples distal and proximal to the placenta differed significantly in thickness, percentage transmission of visible light and refractive index. The thinnest tissue (freeze-dried AM) had the highest transmission spectra. The thickest tissue (freeze-thawed AM proximal to the placenta) had the highest refractive index. Using the direct summation of fields method to predict transparency from an equivalent thickness of corneal tissue, AM was found to be up to 85% as transparent as human cornea.

Conclusion When preparing AM for ocular surface reconstruction within the visual field, consideration should be given to its original location from within the fetal sac and its method of preservation, as either can influence corneal transparency.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding We would like to acknowledge funding support from the NC3R and JSPS Furusato Award (CJC). KMM is a Royal Society/Wolfson Foundation Merit Award holder.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham.

  • Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles