Effect and sustainability of part-time occlusion therapy for patients with anisometropic amblyopia aged ≥8 years
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea
- Correspondence to Dr Joo Yeon Lee, Section of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, 896 Pyeong-chon-Dong, Dong-an-Gu, Anyang-City, Gyeong-gi-Do, 431-070, Republic of Korea (South Korea); ljy690725{at}hanmail.net
- Accepted 29 November 2009
- Published Online First 7 June 2010
Abstract
Aims To study the effect and long-term sustainability of part-time occlusion therapy for anisometropic amblyopia after 8 years of age.
Methods A total of 41 anisometropic amblyopes aged ≥8 years were analysed. In six patients, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of amblyopic eye improved more than two lines within 2 weeks of full-time spectacle wear. The remaining patients were assigned to perform part-time patching during out-of-school hours. Long-term results were assessed in patients who were observed over 1 year after the end of the treatment.
Results Among 35 patients, four dropped out, refusing further treatment, and one changed to atropine penalisation. The part-time patching schedule was completed in 30 patients. 90% of patients (27/30) complied well. Mean BCVA in the amblyopic eye improved significantly (p<0.001), and 96.7% of patients (29/30) achieved the final BCVA of 0.1 logMAR or better. In long-term results, 87% preserved the BCVA of 0.1 logMAR or better. None of four dropouts achieved the BCVA of 0.1 logMAR or better in long-term results even on the continuous spectacle wear.
Conclusions The part-time occlusion treatment in school-aged amblyopes, which had been carried out after school hours, was successful and the effect was sustained in most cases.
Footnotes
-
Summary of this study was presented at the 32nd Meeting of the European Strabismological Association in September 2008.
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- Accepted 29 November 2009
- Published Online First 7 June 2010









