Article Text

PDF
Prevalence of anisometropia and its association with refractive error and amblyopia in preschool children
  1. Sonia Afsari1,
  2. Kathryn A Rose2,
  3. Glen A Gole3,
  4. Krupa Philip4,
  5. Jody F Leone2,
  6. Amanda French2,
  7. Paul Mitchell1
  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology, Westmead Millennium Institute, Centre for Vision Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  2. 2Discipline of Orthoptics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  3. 3Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Queensland, Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  4. 4Brien Holden Vision Institute, School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Professor Paul Mitchell, Department of Ophthalmology, Westmead Millennium Institute, Centre for Vision Research, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia; paul.mitchell{at}sydney.edu.au

Abstract

Aim To determine the age and ethnicity-specific prevalence of anisometropia in Australian preschool-aged children and to assess in this population-based study the risk of anisometropia with increasing ametropia levels and risk of amblyopia with increasing anisometropia.

Methods A total 2090 children (aged 6–72 months) completed detailed eye examinations in the Sydney Paediatric Eye Disease Study, including cycloplegic refraction, and were included. Refraction was measured using a Canon RK-F1 autorefractor, streak retinoscopy and/or the Retinomax K-Plus 2 autorefractor. Anisometropia was defined by the spherical equivalent (SE) difference, and plus cylinder difference for any cylindrical axis between eyes.

Results The overall prevalence of SE and cylindrical anisometropia ≥1.0 D were 2.7% and 3.0%, for the overall sample and in children of European-Caucasian ethnicity, 3.2%, 1.9%; East-Asian 1.7%, 5.2%; South-Asian 2.5%, 3.6%; Middle-Eastern ethnicities 2.2%, 3.3%, respectively. Anisometropia prevalence was lower or similar to that in the Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study, Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study and the Strabismus, Amblyopia and Refractive error in Singapore study. Risk (OR) of anisometropic amblyopia with ≥1.0 D of SE and cylindrical anisometropia was 12.4 (CI 4.0 to 38.4) and 6.5 (CI 2.3 to 18.7), respectively. We found an increasing risk of anisometropia with higher myopia ≥−1.0 D, OR 61.6 (CI 21.3 to 308), hyperopia > +2.0 D, OR 13.6 (CI 2.9 to 63.6) and astigmatism ≥1.5 D, OR 30.0 (CI 14.5 to 58.1).

Conclusions In this preschool-age population-based sample, anisometropia was uncommon with inter-ethnic differences in cylindrical anisometropia prevalence. We also quantified the rising risk of amblyopia with increasing SE and cylindrical anisometropia, and present the specific levels of refractive error and associated increasing risk of anisometropia.

  • Child health (paediatrics)
  • Epidemiology
  • Public health

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.