Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Genome-wide profiling is a clinically relevant and affordable prognostic test in posterior uveal melanoma
  1. Nathalie Cassoux1,
  2. Manuel Jorge Rodrigues2,
  3. Corine Plancher3,
  4. Bernard Asselain3,
  5. Christine Levy-Gabriel1,
  6. Livia Lumbroso-Le Rouic1,
  7. Sophie Piperno-Neumann2,
  8. Rémi Dendale4,
  9. Xavier Sastre5,
  10. Laurence Desjardins1,
  11. Jérôme Couturier6
  1. 1Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris, France
  2. 2Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris, France
  3. 3Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie 25 rue d'Ulm, Paris, France
  4. 4Department of Radiotherapy Orsay Proton therapy, Center Institut Curie Orsay, Paris, France
  5. 5Department of Pathology, Institut Curie 25 rue d'Ulm, Paris, France
  6. 6Department of Genetics, Institut Curie 25 rue d'Ulm, Paris, France
  1. Correspondence to Dr Nathalie Cassoux, Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut curie 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France; nathalie.cassoux{at}curie.net

Abstract

Objective This study investigated the capacity of genetic analysis of uveal melanoma samples to identify high-risk patients and discusses its clinical implications.

Methods Patients with posterior uveal melanoma were prospectively enrolled. Tumour samples were derived from enucleated globe, fine-needle aspirates or endoresection. Chromosome 3 and 8 status was determined by array comparative genomic hybridisation (array-CGH). Patients were followed after treatment to detect metastasis.

Results Four groups were classified by array-CGH. Patients were divided into disomy 3 and normal chromosome 8 (D3/8nl), disomy 3 and 8q gain (D3/8g), monosomy 3 and normal chromosome 8 (M3/8nl) and monosomy 3 and 8 or 8q gain (M3/8g). Median follow-up was 28 months (range: 1–147 months). At the end of the study, 128 patients (33.7%) had developed metastasis and 96 patients had died. Univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that factors associated with metastasis included basal tumour diameter p=0.0007, tumour thickness p=0.01, mixed/epithelioid cell type p=0.0009 and genomic data p<0.0001. High-risk profile was more strongly associated with metastasis than the other prognostic factors p<0.001. Multivariate Cox modelling analysis showed that the status of chromosomes 3 and 8 were the only two variables that independently contributed to prognosis: monosomy 3 alone p=0.001 and monosomy 3 and 8q gain p<0.0001.

Conclusions Array-CGH allowed identification of three prognostic groups with low, intermediate and high risk of developing metastasis. Array-CGH is a reliable and inexpensive method for uveal melanoma prognosis. This method is now currently used in France.

  • Choroid
  • Pathology
  • Diagnostic tests/Investigation
  • Genetics

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.