Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Cone photoreceptor definition on adaptive optics retinal imaging
  1. Manickam Nick Muthiah1,2,3,
  2. Carlos Gias3,
  3. Fred Kuanfu Chen4,
  4. Joe Zhong2,
  5. Zoe McClelland2,
  6. Ferenc B Sallo5,
  7. Tunde Peto1,5,
  8. Peter J Coffey3,
  9. Lyndon da Cruz1,2,3
  1. 1National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology, London, UK
  2. 2Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK
  3. 3Division of Cellular Therapy, UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
  4. 4Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science (incorporating Lions Eye Institute), The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
  5. 5Department of Research and Development, The Reading Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Manickam Nick Muthiah, Vitreoretinal Research, Moorfields Eye Hospital, 162 City Road, London EC1V 2PD, UK; drnickmuthiah{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Aims To quantitatively analyse cone photoreceptor matrices on images captured on an adaptive optics (AO) camera and assess their correlation to well-established parameters in the retinal histology literature.

Methods High resolution retinal images were acquired from 10 healthy subjects, aged 20–35 years old, using an AO camera (rtx1, Imagine Eyes, France). Left eye images were captured at 5° of retinal eccentricity, temporal to the fovea for consistency. In three subjects, images were also acquired at 0, 2, 3, 5 and 7° retinal eccentricities. Cone photoreceptor density was calculated following manual and automated counting. Inter-photoreceptor distance was also calculated. Voronoi domain and power spectrum analyses were performed for all images.

Results At 5° eccentricity, the cone density (cones/mm2 mean±SD) was 15.3±1.4×103 (automated) and 13.9±1.0×103 (manual) and the mean inter-photoreceptor distance was 8.6±0.4 μm. Cone density decreased and inter-photoreceptor distance increased with increasing retinal eccentricity from 2 to 7°. A regular hexagonal cone photoreceptor mosaic pattern was seen at 2, 3 and 5° of retinal eccentricity.

Conclusions Imaging data acquired from the AO camera match cone density, intercone distance and show the known features of cone photoreceptor distribution in the pericentral retina as reported by histology, namely, decreasing density values from 2 to 7° of eccentricity and the hexagonal packing arrangement. This confirms that AO flood imaging provides reliable estimates of pericentral cone photoreceptor distribution in normal subjects.

Keywords
  • Adaptive Optics
  • Retinal Imaging
  • Cone Photoreceptor

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.