Article Text

other Versions

PDF
A comparison of measures of reading and intelligence as risk factors for the development of myopia in a UK cohort of children
  1. Cathy Williams (cathy.williams{at}bristol.ac.uk),
  2. Laura Miller (l.l.miller{at}bristol.ac.uk),
  3. Gus Gazzard (gus.gazzard{at}demon.co.uk),
  4. Seang-Mei Saw (cofsawsm{at}nus.edu.sg)
  1. Centre for Child and Adolescent Health, University of Bristol, United Kingdom
  2. Dept of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, UK, United Kingdom
  3. Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK, United Kingdom
  4. National University of Singapore, Singapore

    Abstract

    Purpose Evidence suggests that reading may be an important risk factor for myopia but recent reports find that performance in non-verbal intelligence tests may be more important or that near-work is not associated with myopia.

    Methods Non-cycloplegic autorefraction data were available at the ages of 7 and 10 years from a birth cohort study. Children whose right eye spherical equivalent autorefraction was ≤</= −-1.50 D were categorized as "likely to be myopic". We tested associations between school-based SATS (Standardized Assesment Tests) for reading and mathematics, maternal report of child liking reading, the WORD (Wescher Objective Reading Dimension) test results, verbal and non-verbal IQ and the child being in the "likely to be myopic" group.

    Results 6871 children (59.7% of remaining cohort) had refractive and risk factor data at 7, of whom 1.5% were in the "likely to be myopic" group. Predictors (Odds Ratios, OR: 95%CI) of concurrent (at 7) risk for myopia were good performance in the SATS reading (2.60:1.61, 4.19; p < 0.001), SATS maths (1.90: 1.19, 3.05; p = 0.008), the WORD (2.72:1.60, 4.64; p = 0.001) and verbal IQ tests (1.99, 1.13, 3.52; p =0.055) after adjustment for the number of myopic parents (p = 0.014) and ethnicity (p =0.129). However the strongest predictor of incident myopia developing between 7 and 10 years was the parental report of whether the child liked reading: (4.05:1.27, 12.89; p = 0.031), adjusted for parental myopia (p = 0.033) and ethnicity (p = 0.008).

    Conclusions Factors associated with reading may play a part in myopia development. Further comparisons of different measures of reading-related activity or verbal ability may help clarify which of the related behavioural characteristics are causally related to myopia prevalence.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.