rss
Br J Ophthalmol doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.132506

Knowledge and Beliefs Associated with Refractive Errors and Undercorrection: The Singapore Malay Eye Study

  1. Mohamad Rosman (rosman_sg{at}yahoo.com),
  2. Tien-Yin Wong (ophwty{at}nus.edu.sg),
  3. Wan-Ling Wong,
  4. Mee-Lian Wong,
  5. Seang-Mei Saw (cofsawsm{at}nus.edu.sg)
  1. Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore
  2. Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Australia, Australia
  3. Singapore Eye Research Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
  4. Department of Community, Occupational and Family Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Natio, Singapore
  5. National University of Singapore, Singapore
    • Published Online First 20 June 2008

    Abstract

    Background/Aims: Refractive errors, especially if undercorrected, are common and important cause of poor vision, particularly in Asia. We described the knowledge and beliefs of refractive errors and possible impact of undercorrection in a population-based study in Singapore.

    Methods: This study was a sub-study on 503 subjects with refractive error from a population-based survey of 3,280 adult Malays in Singapore aged 40 to 80 years. We used the Health Belief Model to develop a questionnaire and evaluated subjects with refractive errors on their health beliefs towards adopting health-seeking behaviour for correction of refractive error and compared the responses between undercorrected subjects and subjects with corrected refractive errors.

    Results: Of persons with myopia, 79.5% had heard of myopia, 79.2% of hyperopes had heard of hyperopia, while only 7.7% of those with astigmatism had heard of astigmatism. Adults who had never previously visited an eyecare specialist were less likely to have heard of astigmatism and to know that they have refractive error (p<0.01). Adults with undercorrected refractive error were more likely to be female (61.1% versus 49.3%), and not wear spectacles (41.7% versus 22.3%). Knowledge on astigmatism (1.4% versus 5.6%) and refractive errors (62.6% versus 77.5%) were significantly lower in the undercorrected group.

    Conclusions: The lack of knowledge and awareness of refractive errors are important risk factors for undercorrected refractive error in an urban Singapore population.

    Relevant Article

    Register for free content


    Free sample
    This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
    View free sample issue >>

    Free archive
    The full back archive is now available for BJO. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
    Register to access the free archive >>

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.