rss
Br J Ophthalmol doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.152744

Outcome of cataract surgery at one year in Kenya, the Philippines and Bangladesh

  1. Robert Lindfield (robert.lindfield{at}lshtm.ac.uk),
  2. Hannah Kuper,
  3. Sarah Polack,
  4. Christina Eusebio,
  5. Wanjiku Mathenge,
  6. Zakia Wadud,
  7. Rashid Mamun,
  8. Allen Foster
  1. International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom
  2. International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom
  3. International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom
  4. Cataract Foundation of the Philippines, Philippines
  5. Rift Valley Provincial Hospital, Kenya
  6. Child Sight Foundation, Bangladesh
  7. CHER Foundation, Bangladesh
  8. International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom
    • Published Online First 11 February 2009

    Abstract

    Aims: To assess the change in vision following cataract surgery in Kenya, Bangladesh and the Philippines and to identify causes and predictors of poor outcome.

    Methods: Cases were identified through cross-sectional surveys, community outreach and hospital clinics. They underwent pre-operative visual acuity measurement and ophthalmic examination. Cases were re-examined by an ophthalmologist 8-15 months after cataract surgery. Information on age, gender, poverty and literacy was collected at baseline.

    Results: 452 eyes of 346 people underwent surgery. 124 (27%) eyes had an adverse outcome. In Kenya and the Philippines the main cause of adverse outcome was refractive error (37% and 49% respectively of all adverse outcomes) then co-morbid ocular disease (26% and 27%), whilst in Bangladesh this was co-morbid disease (58%) then surgical complications (21%). There was no significant association between adverse outcome and gender, age, literacy, poverty or pre-operative visual acuity.

    Conclusions: Adverse outcomes following cataract surgery were frequent in the three countries. The main causes were uncorrected refractive error and pre-operative co-morbidities. Cataract surgical programmes need to improve post-operative outcomes, as many patients are not reaching the potential vision available with modern surgery. There should be a focus on correcting refractive error either through operative techniques or post-operative refraction alongside a system for assessing co morbidities and communicating risk to patients. These can only be achieved if there is a commitment to ongoing surgical audit.

    This Article

    1. All Versions of this Article:
      1. bjo.2008.152744v1
      2. 93/7/875 most recent

    Services

    1. Request permissions

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Social bookmarking

    Register for free content


    Free sample
    This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
    View free sample issue >>

    Free archive
    The full back archive is now available for BJO. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
    Register to access the free archive >>

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.