Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Clinical outcomes of Epi-LASIK: One-year results of On- and Off-flap procedures with and without Mitomycin-C
  1. Seong taeck Kim1,
  2. Jae Woong Koh1,*,
  3. Gil Joong Yoon2,
  4. Seong Won Yang1
  1. 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea, Republic of;
  2. 2 Happy Eye Clinic, Gwangju, Korea, Republic of
  1. Correspondence to: Jae Woong Koh, Department of ophthalmology, Department of ophthalmology, Chosun university college of medicine, 588 Seoseok-dong, Dong-gu, Gwangju, 501-717, Korea, Republic of; clearcornea{at}paran.com

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of epi-LASIK performed either on-flap or off-flap with or without 0.02% mitomycin-C (MMC) in terms of corneal haziness, pain scores and satisfaction scores.

Methods: In this nonrandomised comparative retrospective study, the charts of 198 patients (394 eyes) who had undergone an epi-LASIK procedure for myopia (-1.5D to -8.0D spherical equivalent) correction were reviewed. Patients were classified into four groups: Group I: on-flap without MMC, 181 eyes; Group II: on-flap with MMC, 52 eyes; Group III: off-flap without MMC, 93 eyes; Group IV: off-flap with MMC, 68 eyes. We compared the group outcomes on the first day, 1, 3 and 6 months and 1 year after the operation.

Results: The mean uncorrected visual acuity was significantly better in the off-flap groups (III, IV) than the on-flap groups (I, II) on day 1 (P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the spherical equivalent among all groups at 1 year (P = 0.305). Some degree of haziness was present in 10 eyes (Grade II: 2, Grade I: 8), but the haziness level was not significantly different among groups at 1 year (P = 0.533). Pain scores (0-10) were lower in the off-flap groups (III, IV) (P = 0.010). Satisfaction scores (0-10) were higher in the off-flap groups (III, IV), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.248).

Conclusions: Myopic correction by epi-LASIK surgery with all four methods showed stable visual results in terms of the one-year postoperative clinical outcomes. Haziness levels revealed that treatment with 0.02% MMC was less effective than expected. Overall, the off-flap method offered faster visual recovery and less postoperative pain than the on-flap method.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Linked Articles

    • At a glance
      Harminder S Dua Arun D Singh