rss
Br J Ophthalmol doi:10.1136/bjo.2010.200832
  • Clinical science
  • Original article

The economic cost of posterior capsule tear at cataract surgery

  1. Stephen Tuft
  1. Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK
  1. Correspondence to Stephen Tuft, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 162 City Road, London EC1V 2PD, UK; s.tuft{at}ucl.ac.uk
  • Accepted 6 February 2011
  • Published Online First 1 March 2011

Abstract

Purpose To estimate the direct financial burden to healthcare purchasers of a posterior capsule tear (PCT) during cataract surgery.

Methods A retrospective data analysis of cataract surgeries was performed. Patients who had surgery in the 2-year period from April 2005, with a maximum follow-up, to April 2009 were identified. Patients previously under review for ocular comorbidity apart from cataract were excluded. Each case with PCT was matched with an uncomplicated cataract operation performed on the same list by the same grade of surgeon. For both groups, we extracted details of all additional subsequent visits and interventions. Data on the cost of visits and procedures were provided by the Department of Health. We then compared this data between groups.

Results A total of 100 patients with PCT were matched with 100 controls. The preoperative parameters of the two groups were similar. The cases required a median of 3 (mean 3.6, range 0–24) additional postoperative visits compared with 0 (mean 0.19, range 0–8) for controls, with a median duration of follow-up of 74 (mean 129.5, range 6–1316) days for cases compared to 21 (mean 26.1, range 0–308) days for controls (p=0.000). The average cost of extra visits was £475.0 (SD £697.8) for cases and £69.2 (SD £51.0) for controls (p<0.001).

Conclusions Based on the National Health Service national tariff, a PCT during cataract surgery results in significant additional financial cost to healthcare purchasers. A full cost analysis would be required to estimate the additional cost of a PCT for the healthcare provider.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Relevant Article

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.