Article info
PDFClinical science
Original article
Cost-effectiveness of internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling for patients with an idiopathic full-thickness macular hole: results from a randomised controlled trial
- Correspondence to Laura Ternent, Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clarke Building, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK; laura.ternent{at}ncl.ac.uk
Citation
Cost-effectiveness of internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling for patients with an idiopathic full-thickness macular hole: results from a randomised controlled trial
Publication history
- Accepted July 27, 2011
- First published September 6, 2011.
Online issue publication
July 06, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (6 July 2023).
- Previous version (6 July 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.