Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Letters
The long-term psychosocial impact of corrective surgery for adults with strabismus
  1. Sue Jackson1,
  2. Kate Gleeson2
  1. 1 Centre for Health & Clinical Research, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
  2. 2 Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sue Jackson, Centre for Health & Clinical Research, University of the West of England, c/o 9 Sandstone Rise, Winterbourne, Bristol BS36 1BB, UK; hellosue{at}suejackson.me.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Huisingh and McGwin1 have suggested that the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) Jackson et al 2 reported using was an incorrect statistical method to have employed on the repeated measures data collected from adult participants undergoing corrective surgery for strabismus at three time points; 6 weeks preoperatively (T1), 3 months (T2) and 18 months postoperatively. However, Jackson et al 2 also reported the use of …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors KG and SJ contributed to the drafting, revising of the letter and final approval of the letter to be published. No other people werre involved in this work.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval UBHT and University of the West of England, UK.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.