Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Migration study of lens opacities in Bangladeshi adults in London and Bangladesh: a pilot study
  1. Robert P Finger1,2,
  2. Selvaraj Sivasubramaniam3,
  3. Priya Morjaria3,
  4. A Bansal4,
  5. Mohammed Muhit5,
  6. Sanjay Kinra6,
  7. Clare E Gilbert3
  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
  2. 2Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
  3. 3Department of Clinical Research, International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  4. 4Stepney Health Centre, London, UK
  5. 5University of South Asia, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  6. 6Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Prof Clare E Gilbert, International Center for Eye Health, Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; clare.gilbert{at}lshtm.ac.uk

Abstract

Background Lens opacities (LO) occur at an earlier age and have a higher prevalence in developing countries. In this pilot study, we assessed the feasibility and practical challenges of conducting a migration study, testing the hypothesis that migration from Bangladesh to the UK decreases the amount of LO on account of less exposure to adverse environmental factors.

Methods The sample, which was selected from East London, UK and in Bangladesh, underwent detailed examination and lens grading by the same certified grader using Lens Opacification Classification System III. Data were analysed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

Results Considerable difficulties were encountered in recruiting the sample in both locations. 372 Bangladeshis aged 40–70 years were examined: 131 in London and 241 in Bangladesh. Having never migrated from Bangladesh was an independent risk factor for opacities (OR 7.6; 95% CI 3.6 to 15.9; p=0.001) as were age (OR 7.1; 95% CI 4.0 to 12.7; p=0.001) and diabetes (OR 2.5; 95% 1.0 to 6.0; p=0.04). The odds of LO were lower among those who had lived in the UK for a higher proportion of their life (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.93 to 0.99; p=0.01), but this was not significant after adjusting for age and diabetes (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.01; p=0.16).

Discussion The study highlights the challenges of migration studies, and of studies involving ethnic minorities. Preliminary findings suggest that migration to the UK is protective for LO despite a significantly higher rate of diabetes in the UK. A larger study is warranted based on these preliminary findings.

  • Lens and zonules
  • Epidemiology

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • At a glance
    Keith Barton James Chodosh Jost Jonas