Aims To compare the clinical courses of patients with myopic primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) with and without optic disc shape alterations.
Methods In this longitudinal retrospective study, 146 eyes from 146 patients with myopic (axial length(AXL),>24 mm) POAG were classified according to optic disc shape alterations defined by optic disc tilt and/or rotation. Glaucomatous progression was determined by either serial optic disc/retinal nerve fibre layer photographs or visual field (VF) exams. Rate of progression was calculated from serial VF mean deviation (MD) and visual field index values.
Results Mean age, AXL and follow-up duration were 50.1±12.7 years, 26.1±1.6 mm and 4.6±1.3 years, respectively. The progression rate was faster in eyes with a non-tilted optic disc than with a tilted optic disc (−0.30(95% CI; −0.42 to −0.16) vs 0.05(-0.07 to 0.17) dB/year, −0.85(-1.20 to −0.49) vs −0.35(-0.68 to −0.03) %/year, all p<0.05). Twenty eyes (21.3%) in the non-tilted group but only one eye (1.9%) in the tilted group showed VF progression in both superior and inferior hemifields. By logistic regression analysis, worse initial VF MD and less optic disc tilt were significantly associated with both superior and inferior VF progression (OR=0.909 and 0.561 (for 0.1 tilt ratio); p=0.020 and 0.018, respectively).
Conclusion Significant differences in glaucomatous progression were found between eyes with and without optic disc shape alterations, particularly disc tilt. More localised and stable courses of glaucoma progression were observed in eyes with tilted optic discs.
- Intraocular pressure
- Optic Nerve
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Contributors JK: data collection, writing manuscript, proof writing.
KRS: study design, data interpretation, writing manuscript, proof writing.
JMP: data collection.
Funding This study was supported by the Student Research Grant (2016) of University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, and the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) which is funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (no. NRF-2014R1A1A3A04051089).
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Patient consent was exempted due to the retrospective design of the study.
Ethics approval Institutional Review Board of Asan Medical Center.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.