Elsevier

Ophthalmology

Volume 105, Issue 4, 1 April 1998, Pages 606-611
Ophthalmology

Results of laser in situ keratomileusis in different degrees of myopia1

Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, Chicago, Illinois, October 1996.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(98)94012-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to analyze the results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in different degrees of myopia.

Material and methods

Three hundred consecutive eyes were divided into 4 groups according to their degree of preoperative myopia. Group I was between −3 and −6 diopters (D) (28 eyes), low myopia. Group II was between −6.25 and −10 D (138 eyes), moderate myopia. Group III was between −10.25 and −15 D (91 eyes), high myopia. Group IV was between −15.25 and −25.50 D (43 eyes), extremely high myopia. Patients were observed for 6 to 25 months.

Results

For group I, the preoperative spherical equivalent was −5.12 D ± 0.81 standard deviation (SD), corrected visual acuity was 0.88 ± 0.14 (SD), and keratometry was 44.09 D ± 1.65 (SD). At the last check-up, the spherical equivalent was −0.42 D ± 0.98 (SD), corrected visual acuity was 0.89 ± 0.15 (SD), keratometry was 39.11 D ± 1.61 (SD).

For group II, preoperative spherical equivalent was −8.33 D ± 1.24 (SD), corrected visual acuity was 0.72 ± 0.22 (SD), keratometry was 44.34 D ± 1.64 (SD). At last check-up, the spherical equivalent was −0.19 D ± 1.22 (SD), corrected visual acuity was 0.76 ± 0.17 (SD), keratometry was 37.56 D ± 1.90 (SD).

For group III, the preoperative spherical equivalent was −12.37 D ± 1.49 (SD), corrected visual acuity was 0.58 ± 0.23 (SD), and keratometry was 44.06 D ± 1.63 (SD). At last check-up, spherical equivalent was −0.55 D ± 1.63 (SD), corrected visual acuity was 0.61 ± 0.18 (SD), and keratometry was 35.88 D ± 2.18 (SD).

For group IV, the preoperative spherical equivalent was −19.04 ± 2.82 (SD), corrected visual acuity was 0.37 ± 0.17 (SD), and keratometry was 44.02 D ± 1.30 (SD). At last check-up, spherical equivalent was −1.49 D ± 1.54 (SD), corrected visual acuity was 0.44 ± 0.18 (SD), and keratometry was 33.94 D ± 2.54 (SD).

Conclusion

With some exceptions, LASIK results generally are acceptable and stable. Nevertheless, the scatter of some cases shows that there is room for improvement, even in the most sophisticated excimer software.

The high regression of group I proves the need to sample multizone software to determine whether stability is improved. Although visual results are better in patients with lower myopia, the patients whose eyes had higher ametropia more often showed improvement in their visual acuity. This may be because of the greater postoperative size of the image on the macula.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

The first 300 consecutive eyes underwent myopic LASIK between February 1994 and December 1995. The equipment used was the Automatic Corneal Shaper (Chiron Vision, Irvine, CA) and the Omnimed Excimer Laser (Summit Technology, Inc, Waltham, MA).

Before and after surgery, the patients were examined thoroughly, including undergoing corneal topography and pachymetry. All patients with progressive corneal pathology were excluded as well as those with any other ocular disease except maculopathy or

Group I (28 eyes)

The treated patients with myopia had an average of −5.12 D with a range of −3 to −6 D, standard deviation (SD) of 0.81. At the first postoperative month visit for the 28 eyes, the average residual spherical equivalent was +0.56 with a range of −1.50 to +3.25 D. The SD was 0.96. The obtained correction was therefore 5.68 D (110.94%).

Twenty-seven of the 28 patients were seen at the last 6 months after surgery. The average spherical equivalent was −0.42 within a range of −3 to +1.38 D and an SD of

Discussion

The findings regarding spherical equivalent, corrected visual acuity, uncorrected visual acuity, and keratometry were analyzed for 300 eyes, divided into 4 groups according to the degree of myopia.

At the first month after postoperative check-up, the spherical equivalent of the first three groups showed an overcorrection that improved with time. Group I achieved 110.94%, group II achieved 105.40%, group III achieved 101.53%, and group IV (myopia >15 D) achieved 94.75% of the attempted

References (7)

  • J.I. Barraquer
  • L.A. Ruiz et al.

    A new refractive surgical approachin situ keratomileusis for myopia and lamellar keratoplasty for hyperopia

    Ophthalmology

    (1988)
  • J.I. Barraquer
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (82)

  • Laser in situ keratomileusis for -6.00 to -18.00 diopters of myopia and up to -5.00 diopters of astigmatism: 15-year follow-up

    2015, Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    The most statistically significant correlation was between the RSB and the refractive status at the end of the follow-up. The retreatment rate was 30.77%, which is similar that in previous studies of laser refractive surgery for different grades of ametropia.18–23 These studies found a retreatment rate of between 20% and 30% after LASIK.

  • Outcome of a 10-year follow-up of laser in situ laser keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism

    2014, Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The efficacy results of this study were inferior to those of the study based on the data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA),25 which reported that 97% achieved a postoperative UCVA of 20/40, and 62% of the eyes achieved 20/20 UCVA (86.1% for 20/40 and 52.0% for 20/20 at 10 years in our study). However, our results are comparable to previous studies of LASIK for high myopia, which show that 46–78% of eyes achieved UCVA of 20/40 or better after 6 months of follow-up.2,5,8,15–22 Regarding the visual outcomes, the safety index was good (0.99), which is comparable with the safety index of 1.08 in a large, long-term study.11

  • Ten-year Follow-up of Laser In Situ Keratomileusis for High Myopia

    2008, American Journal of Ophthalmology
    Citation Excerpt :

    These observations may infer that regression attributable to chronic stromal remodeling leading to corneal ectasia is a less likely event after LASIK for moderate myopia. Our retreatment rate was 30%, which was similar to the previous reports of laser refractive surgery for high myopes that found a retreatment rate between 30% to 40% after PRK or LASIK for high myopia.13,16–23 Although it is not always easy to define a clear cut, the reasons for retreatments were under correction in 37 (68%) of 54 eyes, followed by regression in 14 eyes (26%), and both over correction and regression in three eyes (6%).

  • Ten-Year Follow-up of Laser In Situ Keratomileusis for Myopia of up to -10 Diopters

    2008, American Journal of Ophthalmology
    Citation Excerpt :

    We found that 73% (64% for the no retreatment group and 75% for the retreatment group) of eyes were within ± 1.00 D and 92% were within ± 2.00 D 10 years after LASIK. These results are similar to those of previous short-term follow-up studies of LASIK for moderate myopia: O’Doherty and associates and Pallikaris and Siganos, with a long-term follow-up of six years, found that between 33% and 66% of eyes were within ± 1.00 D after myopic LASIK9,10; other authors,11,15–19 in studies of LASIK for moderate myopia with shorter than 12 months of follow-up, found that between 40% and 85% of eyes were within ± 1.00 D after surgery. Some previous studies suggested that myopic ablations were accompanied by a hyperopic shift and that the magnitude of the hyperopic shift increased with the magnitude of attempted correction.20,21

View all citing articles on Scopus
1

The authors have no proprietary interest in any of the materials used in this study.

View full text