Original article
Tear Osmolarity in the Diagnosis and Management of Dry Eye Disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.10.032Get rights and content

Purpose

To evaluate the use of tear osmolarity in the diagnosis of dry eye disease.

Design

A prospective, observational case series to determine the clinical usefulness of tear osmolarity and commonly used objective tests to diagnose dry eye disease.

Methods

A multicenter, 10-site study consisting of 314 consecutive subjects between 18 and 82 years of age. Bilateral tear osmolarity, tear film break-up time (TBUT), corneal staining, conjunctival staining, Schirmer test, and meibomian gland grading were performed. Diagnostic performance was measured against a composite index of objective measurements that classified subjects as having normal, mild or moderate, or severe dry eye. The main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and intereye variability.

Results

Of the 6 tests, tear osmolarity was found to have superior diagnostic performance. The most sensitive threshold between normal and mild or moderate subjects was found to be 308 mOsms/L, whereas the most specific was found at 315 mOsms/L. At a cutoff of 312 mOsms/L, tear hyperosmolarity exhibited 73% sensitivity and 92% specificity. By contrast, the other common tests exhibited either poor sensitivity (corneal staining, 54%; conjunctival staining, 60%; meibomian gland grading, 61%) or poor specificity (tear film break-up time, 45%; Schirmer test, 51%). Tear osmolarity also had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.89). Intereye differences in osmolarity were found to correlate with increasing disease severity (r2 = 0.32).

Conclusions

Tear osmolarity is the best single metric both to diagnose and classify dry eye disease. Intereye variability is a characteristic of dry eye not seen in normal subjects.

Section snippets

Methods

A prospective, exploratory, multicenter study was undertaken at 10 sites in the European Union and the United States. The subject population consisted of randomly presenting subjects between the ages of 18 and 82 years of both sexes, including those with and without a history of dry eye disease. Investigators were instructed to recruit roughly a 2:1 ratio of presumed dry eye patients to normals. This report documents the results of the analysis of the initial 314 subjects, 15 of whom were

Results

Tear osmolarity was found to have a 72.8% sensitivity and 92.0% specificity at a cutoff value of 312 mOsms/L (i.e., values > 311 mOsms/L; Table 1). No other clinical sign exhibited more than 62% performance in both categories. Corneal staining, conjunctival staining, and meibomian grading lacked sensitivity (54.0%, 60.3%, and 61.2% respectively), whereas TBUT and Schirmer results lacked specificity (45.3% and 50.7%, respectively). The performance of osmolarity was consistent with earlier

Discussion

The development and availability of a new technology (TearLab; FDA 510(k) k083184) enables the clinician to collect and measure osmolarity in a 50 nL sample with minimal disturbance of the tear film.5 This microfluidic lab-on-a-chip device both collects tears and produces a reading within seconds before evaporation can influence solute concentration. This eliminates the need for sample transfer or user handling. This technique is applicable in the near-patient setting and overcomes many of the

Michael A. Lemp, a corneal specialist, is clinical professor of ophthalmology at Georgetown and George Washington universities, former chair of ophthalmology at Georgetown, and the author of 210 scientific papers and five books. He is retired from clinical practice but is active in clinical research in ocular surface disease. He is founding editor of The Ocular Surface, recipient of the Castroviejo medal, reviewer for eight journals and consultant for companies developing drugs and devices.

References (24)

  • A. Tomlinson et al.

    Tear film osmolarity: determination of a referent for dry eye diagnosis

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2006)
  • A. Tomlinson et al.

    Comparison of human tear film osmolarity measured by electrical impedance and freezing point depression techniques

    Cornea

    (2010)
  • Cited by (502)

    • Diagnosing dry-eye: Which tests are most accurate?

      2023, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Michael A. Lemp, a corneal specialist, is clinical professor of ophthalmology at Georgetown and George Washington universities, former chair of ophthalmology at Georgetown, and the author of 210 scientific papers and five books. He is retired from clinical practice but is active in clinical research in ocular surface disease. He is founding editor of The Ocular Surface, recipient of the Castroviejo medal, reviewer for eight journals and consultant for companies developing drugs and devices.

    View full text