Elsevier

Brachytherapy

Volume 10, Issue 4, July–August 2011, Pages 331-339
Brachytherapy

A 17-year retrospective study of institutional results for eye plaque brachytherapy of uveal melanoma using 125I, 103Pd, and 131Cs and historical perspective

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2011.01.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

To compare overall survival, local and distant failure rates, ocular toxicity, and vision preservation in patients treated with eye plaque brachytherapy at Tufts Medical Center with those in the published literature.

Methods and Materials

Records were reviewed for 53 patients with the diagnosis of uveal melanoma treated with plaque brachytherapy at Tufts Medical Center over the past 17 years. American Joint Committee on Cancer staging (T1, T2, or T3) were 4, 39, and 10 patients, respectively. All the patients were treated using 125I (n = 37), 103Pd (n = 5), or 131Cs (n = 11) to a dose of 85 Gy (documented as 100 Gy before 1996 for the same physical dose).

Results

With a mean followup of 75 months, 38 of 53 patients were still alive. Five patients (all 125I) developed liver metastases (9%) with no evidence of local failure. There were 10 definitive local failures and four additional transpupillary thermo-therapy procedures performed to ensure local control for lesions slow to respond. Twelve patients (23%) required enucleation. At most recent followup, 32 patients (71%) maintained 20/200 vision or better in the treated eye. In this first report of 131Cs plaque therapy with a mean followup of 20 months, there were two transpupillary thermo-therapy procedures and one definitive failure requiring enucleation after 10 months.

Conclusions

Our disease control and ocular results were comparable to those in the literature given the extended followup. We are developing a multi-institutional, prospective clinical protocol for considering radionuclide selection and other prescriptive criteria.

Introduction

When compared with enucleation, eye plaque brachytherapy provides adequate control of primary uveal melanoma tumors, superior vision, and globe preservation [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Brachytherapy, when compared to external beam radiotherapy techniques, allows for dose limitation to the retina, optic nerve, lacrimal gland, and eyelids. Since the 2001 publication of the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) on 657 patients, many institutions have published their experiences. These studies primarily include the use of two radionuclides: iodine-125 (125I) [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17] and palladium-103 (103Pd) [18], [19], [20], [21]. The literature also contains some reports of cobalt-60 (60Co) (22), iridium-192 (192Ir) [22], [23], and ruthenium-106 (106Ru) [20], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30].

In 2003, the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) published recommendations for the treatment of uveal melanoma using brachytherapy plaques (31). These recommendations covered appropriate patient selection, plaque design, treatment planning, and dose prescription and delivery. Radionuclides available for eye plaque brachytherapy were reviewed, but specific recommendations regarding radionuclide selection were not made. Existing literature contains limited results examining radionuclide choice.

In this article, results from our institutional experience using 125I, 103Pd, and uniquely cesium-131 (131Cs) were analyzed, focusing on overall survival, local control, distant metastases, ocular toxicity, and visual acuity (32). Implicit in this analysis, we compared outcomes as a function of radionuclide. Also provided is a comprehensive literature review covering publications spanning the last two decades, and comparison of these results with our observations.

Section snippets

Methods and materials

Records were available for 53 patients treated at Tufts Medical Center (TMC) between January 29, 1992 and July 14, 2009. Patients were included in this retrospective study if they met the following criteria: at least 4 years followup postimplant, followup until the time of enucleation or death, or followup within 6 months of the study end date (March 22, 2010). Table 1 summarizes patient characteristics. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging (T1, T2, or T3) were 4, 39, and 10

Overall survival

At a mean followup of 75 months (range, 2–214 months), 38 of 53 patients were still alive. Cause of death remained unknown in most of the patients who had passed away; however, 4 of 15 patients (27%) were known to have died from metastatic disease to the liver. Median survival was 107 months as illustrated in Fig. 1.

Local control

There were 10 definitive local failures (19%) with a mean time to failure of 30 months (range, 7–150 months). Most of the local failures occurred in men (90%), each of these

Literature review

Review of the literature revealed several COMS reports presenting data from the only randomized multi-institutional prospective trial of eye plaque brachytherapy for the treatment of uveal melanoma [1], [3], [4], [5]. Four reports of a single-center prospective trial using 103Pd have been published [18], [19], [20], [21], and a number of retrospective reviews have been published. Table 6 outlines the number of patients, followup, radionuclide selection, local control rates, distant failure

Conclusion

The results of this retrospective study of 53 patients treated with eye plaque brachytherapy for uveal melanoma between 1992 and 2009 at TMC are consistent with those reported in the literature. Uniquely included are patients treated with 131Cs where results were comparable to those for other radionuclides (i.e., 125I and 103Pd). This work supports development of a prospective clinical protocol for considering radionuclide selection and other prescriptive criteria.

References (40)

  • P.T. Finger et al.

    Palladium-103 plaque radiation therapy for choroidal melanoma: An 11-year study

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2002)
  • B. Damato et al.

    Local tumor control after 106Ru brachytherapy of choroidal melanoma

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2005)
  • K. Gunduz et al.

    Radiation complications and tumor control after plaque radiotherapy of choroidal melanoma with macular involvement

    Am J Ophthalmol

    (1999)
  • S. Nag et al.

    The American brachytherapy society recommendations for brachytherapy of uveal melanomas

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2003)
  • K.L. Leonard et al.

    Eye plaque brachytherapy for the treatment of uveal melanoma: The 2010 Tufts Medical Center experience

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2010)
  • H. Zhang et al.

    A comprehensive dosimetric comparison between 131Cs and 125I brachytherapy sources for COMS eye plaque implant

    Brachytherapy

    (2010)
  • M.J. Rivard et al.

    The impact of prescription depth, dose rate, plaque size, and source loading on the central axis using 103Pd, 125I, and 131Cs

    Brachytherapy

    (2008)
  • Design and methods of a clinical trial for a rare condition: The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study. COMS Report No. 3

    Control Clin Trials

    (1993)
  • Incidence of cataract and outcomes after cataract surgery in the first 5 years after iodine-125 brachytherapy in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study: COMS Report No. 27

    Ophthalmology

    (2007)
  • Quality of life after iodine-125 brachytherapy vs. enucleation for choroidal melanoma: 5-Year results from the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study: COMS QOLS Report No. 3

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (2006)
  • Cited by (45)

    • Analysis of dose to the macula, optic disc, and lens in relation to vision toxicities – A retrospective study using COMS eye plaques

      2022, Physica Medica
      Citation Excerpt :

      Based on eligibility, affordability, cosmetic appeal, and favorable treatment outcome, plaque brachytherapy is currently the primary treatment method for medium-size uveal melanoma (3.1–8.0 mm thickness), as opposed to external beam therapy [12]. A wide range of reported toxicity and incidence rates for plaque brachytherapy exist across institutional studies with radiation retinopathy rates extending from 20 to 74 %, and cataract rates varying from 15 to 68 % [6,10,13–15]. Multivariate models have indicated that patient age, smoking status, and preexisting medical conditions as well as tumor apex height, tumor basal diameter, have a statistically significant impact on patient outcome and toxicities [2,4,9].

    • Local tumor control and treatment related toxicity after plaque brachytherapy for uveal melanoma: A systematic review and a data pooled analysis

      2022, Radiotherapy and Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      A reference list of 662 records was identified from the initial PubMed search. After screening and after applying the exclusion criteria (Supplementary Fig. S1), the two reviewers agreed to include 103 studies [1,8,9,11–16,29–122] for data collection and modelling of outcomes. Full details of the included studies are reported in Supplementary Materials Table 1.

    • Dose-response in choroidal melanoma

      2018, Radiotherapy and Oncology
    • Evaluating Retinal Sequelae of Radioactive Episcleral Plaque Brachytherapy for Medium-Sized Choroidal Melanomas Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

      2017, Advances in Ophthalmology and Optometry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Despite radical surgical excision, there remained a 45% mortality rate from metastasis by 15 years [5]. Radiation therapy, in the form of brachytherapy, was first pioneered in Europe in the 1930s as a potential globe-salvaging treatment option for uveal melanoma [6]. Brachytherapy thus became an alternative therapy with less morbidity than enucleation, but was not performed routinely in the United States until the National Eye Institute introduced a prospective study to evaluate this treatment option.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was presented in part at the 52nd annual meeting of the American Society for Radiation Therapy on 1 November 2010 in San Diego, CA.

    Conflicts of interest: Drs. Leonard, Gagne, Mignano, Duker, and Bannon have no conflicts of interest. Dr. Rivard is a consultant to GE HealthCare, Inc. and IsoRay Medical, Inc.

    View full text