How genetic is school myopia?
Introduction
Since it was first realised that highly educated people are more likely to be myopic than less educated people, there has been a continuing debate over whether myopia is inherited, or environmentally determined. This debate is encapsulated in two conflicting ideas; that those born to be myopic naturally gravitate to academic studies and near work occupations, or that engaging in these activities, particularly during development, causes myopia.
A comprehensive review of the literature led Curtin (1985) to the following conclusions:
Recent investigations convincingly indicate that the development of refraction can be influenced to some extent, in that the eye seems to develop post-natally towards emmetropia. Certain environmental factors appear capable of deranging this process and thereby produce myopia, often of high degree.
The debate around these propositions has not been settled, as the correspondence provoked by a recent clinical review (Fredrick, 2002) has demonstrated. However, the last 20 years has seen considerable clarification of some of the issues. It is now clear that myopia largely results from a failure of the eye growth control processes that normally adjust the axial length of the eye to its optical power. Excessive axial eye growth relative to the optical power of the cornea and lens is responsible for myopic refractive error, and excessive axial elongation is also responsible for myopia's longer-term pathological consequences.
It is also now clear that myopia is not one disorder, but can be classified into categories based on familial inheritance, severity, age of onset, progression and pathological consequences. This points to considerable heterogeneity in the underlying causes of the failure in control of eye growth. However, it should be cautioned that the distinctions between categories are not clear-cut. In particular, the severity of myopia does not provide a simple distinction between myopias of genetic and environmental origin.
The area of biggest concern, which will be the focus of this article, is juvenile-onset or school myopia. This category excludes early onset forms of high myopia that are often associated with clear familial inheritance (see Section 3.1), or with severe environmental distortions of visual input (see Section 5.2.3). In classical cases of school myopia, clinically significant myopic refractive errors appear over the ages 8–14, in the late primary school or early secondary school years. Further progression of myopia may occur over the next 10–15 years, up to the age of about 30, and incident cases of myopia may appear over this time. This form of myopia can affect a large proportion of the population, and is increasing dramatically in prevalence and severity in many parts of the world, in association with a decrease in the age of onset (see 4.4.1 Taiwan, 4.4.2 Singapore).
The central issue is not whether genes are involved in the development of school myopia. Eye growth is a biological process, involving tissues such as the retina, choroid and sclera. Gene expression, and changes in gene expression must therefore be involved, and the involvement of a range of biochemical pathways in the control of eye growth in animal models has been documented (for recent reviews see Feldkamper and Schaeffel, 2003; McBrien and Gentle, 2003; Morgan, 2003; Schaeffel et al., 2003). However, this only establishes that there is a biological basis for a contribution of genetic variation to refractive error. The crucial question is to what extent do genetic differences actually contribute to variations in refractive status in humans. We will consider three major questions:
- •
To what extent does genetic variation contribute to individual differences in eye length and refractive error?
- •
To what extent does genetic variation between populations contribute to different prevalences in myopia in different populations in different parts of the world?
- •
Is the increasing prevalence of myopia seen in many parts of the world due primarily to environmental change?
Section snippets
Emmetropisation—a developmental process for matching eye length to optical power
Significant genetic contributions to eye size might be expected, in view of the abundant evidence for genetic contributions to growth processes which result, for example, in variations in height both within and between populations (Silventoinen et al., 2000; Silventoinen, 2003; Wu et al., 2003). However, the impact of differences in eye size on refractive error could be minimised due to emmetropisation—the process of eye development in both humans and other animals that involves an active
Evidence for genetic determination of myopia and eye length
Evidence for genetic determination of biological characteristics comes in the first instance from studies of familial inheritance of those characteristics. This is usually followed by the search for chromosomal localisation and ultimately molecular characterisation of the gene or genes involved.
Evidence for environmental factors in the development of school myopia
In contrast to the limited evidence for genetic determination of refractive error, there is considerable evidence of the importance of environmental factors. The first set of evidence comes from studies that have shown that the prevalence of myopia and high myopia is changing rapidly, at least in some parts of the world.
Environmental determinants of the prevalence of myopia
In the absence of sufficient information on longitudinal changes in the prevalence of myopia, evidence of the impact of environmental factors on the prevalence of myopia indicates that there is plasticity in refractive error and eye growth. Where these environmental factors are changing rapidly, it would be expected that the prevalence of myopia would change as well.
Are there differences in the intrinsic prevalence of myopia or susceptibility to environmental impacts between population groups?
The prevalence of myopia varies significantly around the world, with significant differences between different racial and ethnic groups. This is often taken as evidence for genetic determination, either of refractive error, or of susceptibility to environmental factors, where the relevant genes are differentially distributed between different populations. However, this sort of analysis must take into account the different environments that exist around the world, including the level of
Conclusions
Overall, while there is good evidence for a major role for genetic variation in familial forms of early onset high myopia, there is little evidence for a major role for genetic determination in school myopia. The high heritabilities observed in twin studies suggest that genetic factors do have a role in school myopia, but the evidence from broader family studies suggests that some of the high correlations observed between genetically related family members may be due to shared environments as
References (319)
- et al.
Refractive errors in an older populationthe Blue Mountains Eye Study
Ophthalmology
(1999) - et al.
Prevalence of myopia in Africans. Survey in Monrovia and Dar es Salaam
Am. J. Ophthalmol.
(1967) - et al.
Y-chromosome evidence for differing ancient demographic histories in the Americas
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
(2003) The development of myopia in Hong Kong children between the ages of 7 and 12 yearsa five-year longitudinal study
Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt.
(1999)- et al.
Cycloplegic refractions in infants and young children
Am. J. Ophthalmol.
(1980) - et al.
Increase in ocular axial length in patients with corneal opacification
Ophthalmology
(1988) - et al.
mtDNA affinities of the peoples of North-Central Mexico
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
(2000) - et al.
Five-year refractive changes in an older populationthe Blue Mountains Eye Study
Ophthalmology
(2003) - et al.
Response AC/A ratios are elevated in myopic children
Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt.
(1999) Nearsightedness in the public schools
N. Y. Med. Rec.
(1877)
Myopia and level of education
Eur. J. Ophthalmol.
Refraction in West Greenland Eskimos
Acta Ophthalmol.
Amblyopia in ptosis
Arch. Ophthalmol.
Strabismus in ptosis
Arch. Ophthalmol.
Visual characteristics of natives in Fiji, South Pacific
J. Am. Optom. Assoc.
Heritability of myopic refractive errors in identical and fraternal twins
Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol.
The epidemiology of myopia
Am. J. Epidemiol.
Nearwork, school achievement and myopia
J. Biosocial Sci.
Segregation analysis of ocular refraction and myopia
Hum. Hered.
Education and myopia in 110,236 young Singaporean males
Singapore Med. J.
Race, culture and myopia in 110,236 young Singaporean males
Singapore Med. J.
Epidemiologic study of refractive errors in schoolchildren in socioeconomically deprived regions in Tunisia
J. Fr. Ophtalmol.
Genetic evidence on the origins of Indian caste populations
Genome Res.
Ethnic Indiaa genomic view, with special reference to peopling and structure
Genome Res.
Loss-of-function mutations in a calcium-channel alpha1-subunit gene in Xp11.23 cause incomplete X-linked congenital stationary night blindness
Nat. Genet.
Contrasting patterns of Y chromosome variation in Ashkenazi Jweish and non-Jewish European populations
Hum. Genet.
Incidence of myopia among theological and high school students in Jerusalem
Harefuah
Detection of thirty novel FBN1 mutations in patients with Marfan syndrome or a related fibrillinopathy
Hum. Mutat.
Vision Screening for Elementary Schools
Refractive problems in native peoples (the Sioux Lookout Project)
Can. J. Ophthalmol.
Classical twin studies and beyond
Nat. Rev. Genet.
A summary of 20 CACNA1F mutations identified in 36 families with incomplete X-linked congenital stationary night blindness, and characterization of splice variants
Hum. Genet.
Genetic studies on the Tharu population of Nepalrestriction endonuclease polymorphisms of mitochondrial DNA
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
A Stickler syndrome gene is linked to chromosome 6 near the COL11A2 gene
Hum. Mol. Genet.
The genetic origin of the Jewsa multivariate approach
Hum. Biol.
The application of molecular genetic approaches to the study of human evolution
Nat. Genet.
The History and Geography of Human Genes
Refractive errors in Hong Kong Chinese pre-school children
Optom. Vis. Sci.
A review of myopia studies in Taiwan
Trans. Ophthalmol. Soc. Rep. China
Myopia and night-time lighting during sleep in children and adults
Percept. Mot. Skills
Genetic and environmental effects on the development of myopia in Chinese twin children
Ophthalmic Paediatr. Genet.
Refractive errors in an elderly Chinese population in Taiwanthe Shihpai Eye Study
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
Parental history and myopiataking the long view
J. Am. Med. Assoc.
Pattern of myopia in young Singapore men
Singapore Med. J.
Refractive errors in Singapore medical students
Singapore Med. J.
Hygiene of the Eye
Myopia and intelligencea pleiotropic relationship?
Hum. Genet.
An evolutionary analysis of the aetiology and pathogenesis of juvenile- onset myopia
Acta Ophthalmol. Scand.
Cited by (541)
Urban greenspace and visual acuity in schoolchildren: a large prospective cohort study in China
2024, Environment InternationalAssociations between meeting 24-hour movement guidelines and myopia among school-aged children: A cross-sectional study
2023, Complementary Therapies in Clinical PracticeShedding light on myopia by studying complete congenital stationary night blindness
2023, Progress in Retinal and Eye ResearchRepeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy for Controlling Onset and Progression of Myopia-a Review
2023, International Journal of Medical Sciences