Table 1

Comparison of respondents, non-respondents, and those not contacted in the pre-CLT group

Respondents (n = 79)Non-respondents (n = 38)Difference in proportions (respondents v non-respondents)p ValueNot contacted (n = 30)Difference in proportions (respondents v not-contacted)p Value
% (N)% (N)(95% CI)% (N)(95% CI)
*Comparing white with all other ethnic groups using the UK Office for National Statistics classification.18
Severity
    Severe29 (22)18 (7)11 (6 to 25)0.3433 (10)4 (−15, 19)0.98
    Moderate39 (30)41 (16)3 (−16 to 22)0.9027 (8)12 (1 to 34)0.09
    Mild32 (25)41 (16)9 (−9 to 28)0.4240 (12)8 (−17 to 19)0.91
Parent’s language
    English97 (75)61 (19)36 (19 to 54)0.0000190 (18)7 (−6 to 21)0.40
    Other3 (2)39 (12)10 (2)
Visual impairment in the family
    Yes24 (17)32 (11)8 (−11 to 27)0.5346 (10)22 (−2 to 44)0.10
    No76 (53)68 (23)54 (12)
Complexity of condition
    Visual impairment alone49 (38)59 (17)10 (−11 to 30)0.5353 (16)4 (−17 to 25)0.88
    Additional systemic problems51 (39)41 (12)47 (14)
Ethnicity*
    White91 (70)75 (29)16 (1 to 30)0.0582 (18)9 (8–26)0.42
    Non-white9 (7)25 (9)18 (4)
Deprivation (population quintiles)
    1st, 2nd, 3rd quintile73 (32)44 (11)29 (1 to 47)0.0855 (6)18 (−18 to 46)0.62
    4th, 5th quintile27 (15)56 (14)45 (5)
Deprivation index
    Mean−0.521.23t = −2.900.0051.58t = −1.800.07
    SD3.073.123.31
Age of child
    Mean2.483.80t = −3.660.000042.75t = −.710.47
    SD1.781.961.78