Source | Design | Intervention | Duration of study | No of patients | Percentage of patients with hyperaemia | Jadad Score | ||
LAT | BIMAT | TRAVO | ||||||
Gandolfi et al24 | Parallel | LAT vs BIMAT | 3 months | LAT = 113; BIMAT = 119 | 14.2 | 36.1 | 7 | |
Dubiner et al25 | Parallel | LAT vs BIMAT | 1 month | LAT = 22; BIMAT = 21 | 13.6 | 14.3 | 5 | |
Noecker et al26 | Parallel | LAT vs BIMAT | 6 months | LAT = 136; BIMAT = 133 | 20.6 | 44.4 | 7 | |
Walters et al27 | Parallel | LAT vs BIMAT | 1 month | LAT = 38; BIMAT = 38 | 15.8 | 39.5 | 6 | |
Konstas et al28 | Crossover | LAT vs BIMAT | 7 weeks each treatment | LAT = 21; BIMAT = 21 | 28.6 | 71.4 | 5 | |
Dirks et al29 | Parallel | LAT vs BIMAT | 3 months | LAT = 27; BIMAT = 33 | 7.4 | 21.2 | 6 | |
Konstas et al30 | Crossover | LAT vs BIMAT | 3 months each treatment | LAT = 123; BIMAT = 123 | 7.3 | 26 | 7 | |
Netland et al31 | Parallel | LAT vs TRAVO | 12 months | LAT = 193; TRAVO = 402 | 27.6 | 44 | 6 | |
Parrish et al32 | Parallel | LAT vs TRAVO vs BIMAT | 3 months | LAT = 136; BIMAT = 136; TRAVO = 138 | 47.1 | 68.6 | 58 | 7 |
Parmaksiz et al33 | Parallel | LAT vs TRAVO | 9 months | LAT = 16; TRAVO = 18 | 6.2 | 38.8 | 5 | |
Chen et al34 | Parallel | LAT vs TRAVO | 3 months | LAT = 36; TRAVO = 37 | 8.3 | 13.5 | 6 | |
Garcia-Feijoo et al35 | Parallel | LAT vs TRAVO | 2 weeks | LAT = 30; TRAVO = 32 | 3.3 | 6.2 | 5 | |
Konstas et al36 | Crossover | LAT vs TRAVO | 8 weeks each treatment | LAT = 40; TRAVO = 40 | 15 | 37.5 | 6 |
BIMAT, bimatoprost; LAT, latanoprost; TRAVO, travoprost.