Table 4

Comparisons of visual functioning and Rasch scores between subjects with bilateral cataract and those with bilateral surgery

Bilateral cataract surgery (n=151)Bilateral significant cataract (n=515)p Value*Bilateral minimal cataract (n=2126)p Value*
Mean Rasch score (95% CI)3.38 (3.17 to 3.58)3.11 (3.00 to 3.23)0.0293.75 (3.70 to 3.79)<0.001
Adjusted mean Rasch score (95% CI)3.25 (2.99 to 3.50)3.05 (2.86 to 3.23)0.0953.47 (3.38 to 3.56)0.002
None/mild visual acuity impairment(n=134)(n=316)(n=1978)
Mean Rasch score (95% CI)3.49 (3.30 to 3.70)3.46 (3.34 to 3.58)0.8353.79 (3.75 to 3.83)<0.001
Adjusted mean Rasch score (95% CI)3.38 (3.14 to 3.63)3.35 (3.15 to 3.54)0.7663.50 (3.42 to 3.59)0.018
Moderate/severe visual acuity impairment(n=17)(n=199)(n=148)
Mean Rasch score (95% CI)2.51 (1.78 to 3.23)2.56 (2.34 to 2.77)0.8973.19 (3.00 to 3.39)0.028
Adjusted mean Rasch score (95% CI)2.38 (1.60 to 3.16)2.54 (2.15 to 2.93)0.6702.71 (2.27 to 3.15)0.120
  • Data are presented as mean (SD) or number (%), as appropriate.

  • Cardiovascular disease is defined as a history of angina, myocardial infarction or stroke; low socioeconomic status is defined as having a primary or lower education and an individual monthly income less than $S2000.

  • * p Value to test for difference between bilateral cataract surgery compared with bilateral cataract and both eyes healthy, respectively, based on either a t test or χ2 test, as appropriate.

  • Adjusted for age, gender, cardiovascular disease, current cigarette smoking status, low socioeconomic status and the presence of eye diseases (including age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma).