Table 1

Patient demographics, in vivo confocal microscopy and immunohistological findings

n/67(%)
Demographic characteristics
Female37(55.2)
Age (years)
 34–453(4.5)
 45–558(11.9)
 55–6516(23.9)
 65–7518(26.9)
 75–8516(23.9)
 85–956(9.0)
Ethnic group
 Maasai28(41.8)
 Chagga18(26.9)
 Pare8(11.9)
 Other13(19.4)
In vivo confocal microscopy findings
Median connective tissue scarring score (IQR) n=51*1.00(0.38–2.50)
Connective tissue scarring grade (n (%)) n=51*
 0–126(51.0)
 >1–29(17.6)
 >2–316(31.4)
Median inflammatory cell infiltrate (IQR) n=50*1207(830–2034)
Dendritiform cells present (n (%)) n=54*17(31.5)
Immunohistological findings
Subepithelial connective tissue scarring grade (n (%)) n=60†
 029(48.3)
 118(30.0)
 212(20.0)
 31(1.7)
Tarsal connective tissue scarring grade (n (%)) n=45†
 031(68.9)
 15(11.1)
 27(15.6)
 32(4.4)
Inflammatory cell infiltrate on H&E stain (n (%)) n=65†
 016(24.6)
 129(44.6)
 211(16.9)
 39(13.9)
Cellular CD83 staining (n (%)) n=65†
 014(21.5)
 132(49.2)
 218(27.7)
 31(1.5)
Median number of CD45 cells with dendritic morphology (IQR) n=67†6(4–8)
  • *In vivo confocal microscopy was successfully performed on 54 out of the 67 participants. A small number of the scans were not suitable for connective tissue scarring grading or inflammatory cell counting.

  • †Some samples did not yield gradable sections and several sections did not have adequate tarsal tissue for grading of the connective tissue scarring.