Table 3

Surgeon satisfaction with each stage of the surgery in two groups of eyes that underwent phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation with intracameral Mydrane or standard topical regimen

Mydrane group
(N=268)
Reference group (N=281)Between-group comparison
p Value
First incision
 Uncomplicated266 (99.3)277 (98.6)0.448
 Slightly complicated1 (0.4)3 (1.1)
 Complicated1 (0.4)1 (0.4)
Second incision
 Uncomplicated265 (98.9)277 (98.6)0.752
 Slightly complicated2 (0.7)3 (1.1)
 Complicated1 (0.4)1 (0.4)
Capsulorhexis
 Uncomplicated246 (91.8)260 (92.5)0.769
 Slightly complicated21 (7.8)18 (6.4)
 Complicated1 (0.4)3 (1.1)
Phacoemulsification
 Uncomplicated243 (90.7)266 (94.7)0.086
 Slightly complicated22 (8.2)8 (2.8)
 Complicated3 (1.1)7 (2.5)
Cortex aspiration
 Uncomplicated244 (91.0)255 (90.7)0.865
 Slightly complicated21 (7.8)19 (6.8)
 Complicated3 (1.1)7 (2.5)
IOL implantation
 Uncomplicated259 (96.6)261 (92.9)0.047*
 Slightly complicated8 (3.0)15 (5.3)
 Complicated1 (0.4)5 (1.8)
  • *Statistically significant, p<0.05, with the Cochran–Mantel–Haenzel test.

  • Complicated, technically challenging surgery; IOL, intraocular lens; Mydrane group, patients who received an intracameral injection of a standardised combination of tropicamide 0.02%, phenylephrine 0.31% and lidocaine 1% just after the first incision; Reference group, patients who received a standard topical regimen of one drop each, of tropicamide 0.5% and phenylephrine 10% repeated three times at 10 min intervals beginning 30 min before surgery; Slightly complicated, slightly technically challenging surgery; Uncomplicated, routine surgery, not technically challenging.