You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 95, Issue 6
  • Agreement of visual field interpretation among glaucoma specialists and comprehensive ophthalmologists: comparison of time and methods

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Clinical science
Original article
Agreement of visual field interpretation among glaucoma specialists and comprehensive ophthalmologists: comparison of time and methods
  1. Albert P Lin1,
  2. L Jay Katz2,
  3. George L Spaeth2,
  4. Marlene R Moster2,
  5. Jeffrey D Henderer3,
  6. Courtland M Schmidt Jr2,
  7. Jonathan S Myers2
  1. 1Michael E DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
  2. 2Wills Eye Institute and Thomas Jefferson University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  3. 3Department of Ophthalmology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Albert P Lin, 2002 Holcombe Blvd 112C, Houston, TX 77030, USA; alin{at}bcm.edu.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2010.186569

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Introduction

    The evaluation of serial visual fields is an integral component in the assessment of glaucoma progression. Test variability,1 2 however, makes the assessment of progression difficult, even in reliable field series by experienced observers.3 4 Various methods have been reported to differentiate test variability. Examples include visual field indices that measure overall change,5 spatial and temporal processing …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests None.

    • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Wills Eye Institute Institutional Review Board, located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles

    • At a glance
      Highlights from this issue
      Harminder S Dua Arun D Singh
      British Journal of Ophthalmology 2011; 95 i-i Published Online First: 19 May 2011. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300369