Skip to main content
Log in

Steady-state accommodation and ocular biometry in late-onset myopia

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The steady-state accommodative responses of emmetropes and late-onset myopes was measured for an array of numbers located at +1, +3 and +5 dioptres using an objective infra-red optometer. Responses were compared for passive (reading numbers) and active (adding numbers) conditions. For the passive condition, the late-onset myopes showed a significantly lower accommodative response than the emmetropic group. No significant differences were found between the two groups for the active condition. Ocular biometric characteristics were also measured in emmetropes, late-onset myopes and early-onset myopes using keratometry and ultrasonography. No significant differences in corneal curvature, anterior chamber depth and crystalline lens thickness were found between the groups. Late-onset myopes exhibited significantly deeper vitreous chambers than emmetropes, which more than accounted for the difference in refractive error between the two refractive groups. We conclude that, while significant differences exist in the accommodative responses of late-onset myopes and emmetropes, late-onset myopia is due predominantly to elongation of the vitreous chamber.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goss DA, Winkler RL. Progression of myopia in youth: age of cessation. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1983; 60: 651–8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Working Group on Myopia Prevalence and Progression, Committee on Vision, Commission on Behavioural and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. Myopia: Prevalence and Progression. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grosvenor T. A review and a suggested classification system for myopia on the basis of age-related prevalence and age of onset. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987; 64: 545–54.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hoogerheide I, Rempt F, Hoogenboom WPH. Acquired myopia in young pilots. Ophthalmologica 1971; 163: 209–15.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goss DA, Erickson P, Cox VD. Prevalence and pattern of adult myopia progression in a general optometric practice population. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985; 62: 470–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shotwell AJ. Plus lenses, prisms and bifocal effects on myopia progression in military students. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1981; 58: 349–54.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McBrien NA, Millodot M. Amplitude of accommodation and refractive error. Invest Ophthal Visual Sci 1986; 27: 1187–90.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McBrien NA, Millodot M. The effect of refractive error on the accommodative response gradient. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1986; 6: 145–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bullimore MA, Gilmartin B. Aspects of tonic accommodation in emmetropia and late-onset myopia. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987; 64: 499–503.

    Google Scholar 

  10. McBrien NA, Millodot M. The relationship between tonic accommodation and refractive error. Invest Ophthal Visual Sci 1987; 28: 997–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bullimore MA, Boyd T, Mather HE, Gilmartin B. Near retinoscopy and refractive error. Clin Exp Optom 1988; 71: 114–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bullimore MA, Gilmartin B. The accommodative response, refractive error and mental effort: 1. The sympathetic nervous system. Doc Ophthmol 1988; 69: 385–97.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sorsby A, Benjamin B, Sheridan M. Refraction and its components during growth of the eye from age of three. Medical Research Council Special Report Series, No 301. London: HMSO, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Larsen JS. The sagittal growth of the eye, Part I: Measurement of the depth of the anterior segment from birth to puberty. Acta Ophthalmol 1971; 49: 239–62.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Larsen JS. The sagittal growth of the eye, Part II: Ultrasonic measurement of the axial diameter of the lens and anterior segment from birth to puberty. Acta Ophthalmol 1971; 49: 427–40.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sorsby A, Leary GA. A longitudinal study of refraction and its components during growth. Medical Research Council Special Report Series No 309. London: HMSO, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Larsen JS. The sagittal growth of the eye, Part III: Ultrasonic measurement of the posterior segment from birth to puberty. Acta Ophthalmol 1971; 49: 441–53.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goldschmidt E. On the etiology of myopia. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 1968; 98: 1–172.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Adams AJ. Adult onset myopia: evidence for axial length elongation not corneal curvature increase as the basis. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987; 64: 150–2.

    Google Scholar 

  20. McBrien NA, Millodot M. A biometric investigation of late onset myopic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol 1987; 65: 461–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. McBrien NA, Millodot M. A clinical evaluation of the Canon Autoref R-1. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985; 62: 786–92.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bullimore MA, Gilmartin B, Hogan RE. Objective and subjective measurement of tonic accommodation. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1986; 6: 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pugh JR, Winn B. Modification of the Canon Autoref R-1 for use as a continuously recording infra-red optometer. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1988; 8: 460–4.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gilmartin B, Bullimore MA. Sustained near-vision augments inhibitory sympathetic innervation of the ciliary muscle. Clin Vision Sci 1987; 1: 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schor CM, Kotulak JC, Tsuetaki T. Adaptation of tonic accommodation reduces accommodative lag and is masked in darkness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1986; 27: 820–7.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Malmstrom FV, Randle RJ, Murphy MR, Reed LR, Weber RJ. Visual fatigue: The need for an integrated model. Bull Psychonom Soc 1981; 17: 183–6.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Willemsen EW. Understanding Statistical Reasoning. San Francisco, CA: Freeman, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jones R. Do women and myopes have larger pupils? Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 1990; 31: 1413–5.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Heath GG. The influence of visual acuity on the accommodative response. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1956; 33: 513–24.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Johnson CA. Effects of luminance and stimulus distance on accommodation and visual resolution. J Opt Soc Am 1976; 66: 138–42.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Charman WN, Tucker J. Dependence of accommodation response on the spatial frequency spectrum of the observed object. Vision Res 1977; 17: 129–39.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Charman WN. Static accommodation and the minimum angle of resolution. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1986; 63: 915–21.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Owens DA, Leibowitz HW. The fixation point as a stimulus for accommodation. Vision Res 1975; 15: 1161–3.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fincham EF, Walton J. The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence. J Physiol 1957; 137: 488–588.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Baldwin WR. A review of statistical studies of relations between myopia and ethnic, behavioral and physiological characteristics. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1981; 58: 516–27.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rosenfield M, Gilmartin B. Effect of a near-vision task on the response AC/A ratio of a myopic population. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1987; 7: 225–33.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Young FA, Singer RM, Foster D. The psychological differentiation of male myopes and non-myopes. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1975; 52: 679–86.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Baldwin WR. Accommodative characteristics of a group of myopic adults. Am J Optom Archs Am Acad Optom 1965; 42: 237–43.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gawron VJ. Differences among myopes, emmetropes, and hyperopes. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1981; 58: 753–60.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bullimore MA, Conway R, Nakash A. Myopia in optometry students: Family history, age of onset and personality. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1989; 9: 284–8.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Van Alphen GWHM. On emmetropia and ametropia. Ophthalmologica Suppl 1961; 142: 1–92.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gilmartin B, Bullimore M, Rosenfield M, Winn B. Ciliary muscle tonus and innervation in late-onset myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci Suppl 1989; 30: 325.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bennett AG. A method for determining the equivalent powers of the eye and its crystalline lens without resort to phakometry. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1988; 8: 53–9.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Dunne MCM, Barnes DA, Royston JM. An evaluation of Bennett's method for determining the equivalent powers of the eye and its crystalline lens without resort to phakometry. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1989; 9: 69–71.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Van Alphen G. Choroidal stress and emmetropization. Vision Res 1986; 26: 723–34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bullimore, M.A., Gilmartin, B. & Royston, J.M. Steady-state accommodation and ocular biometry in late-onset myopia. Doc Ophthalmol 80, 143–155 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00161240

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00161240

Key words

Navigation