Skip to main content
Log in

Endothelial cell density and corneal pachometry after no-stitch, small-incision cataract surgery

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a prospective study we used the change of central and peripheral (12 o'clock-position) corneal thickness (CT) after no-stitch small incision cataract surgery as a parameter of tissue traumatisation (33 eyes) and compared the values to a series of cases (32 eyes) with conventional 3.5 mm scleral step incision. In both groups the peripheral measurements showed a higher increase in corneal thickness than the central. After 1 month all eyes regained their central preoperative thickness. Increase in corneal thickness (ACTc, ACTp) after the different postoperative periods were correlated. The values of the central cornea showed no significant difference between the two groups. 1, 7 and 30 days after surgery the increase of peripheral CT was significantly higher in the no-stitch group. This fact was underlined by the clinical aspect at the slit lamp and is due to the anatomical and surgical characteristic of this procedure. One month postoperatively there was no increased endothelial cell loss in the no-stitch group (3%). No-stitch cataract surgery surgery provides a lot of intra- and postoperative advantages. The problem of increased swelling of the peripheral corneal entry seems to be a secondary one as corneal thickness decreases with time. Concerning the prospective endothelial cell loss it is mandatory to study the long term results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Menapace R, Radax U, Amon M, Papapanos P. No-stitch cataract surgery with flexible lenses: Evaluation of 100 consecutive cases. J Cat Refract Surg

  2. Menapace R, Radax U, Amon M, Papapanos P. Kleinschnitt-Kataraktchirurgie ohne Naht: Bericht über 10 konsekutive Fälle. Spektrum der Augenheilkund 1991; 5(4): 135–140.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amon M, Menapace R, Scheidel W. Results of corneal pachometry after small-incision hydrogel-lens-implantation and 7 mm scleral-step incision PMMA-lens-implantation following phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refrac Surgery 1991; 17: 466–470.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng H, Bates AK, Wood L, McPherson K. Positive correlation of corneal thickness. Arch Ophthalmol 1988; 106: 920–922.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maurice DM. The cornea and sclera, in Davson H, ed, The Eye. Orlando, Fla: Academic Press, 1984; vol 18: 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Waring GO, Bourne WM, Edelhauser HF et al. The corneal endothelium: Normal and pathologic structure and function. Ophthalmology 1982; 89: 531–590.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Olsen T. Transient changes in specular appearance of the corneal endothelium and in corneal thickness during anterior uveitis. Acta Ophthalmol 1981; 59: 100–109.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Green K, Livingston V, Bowman K et al. Chlorhexidine effects on corneal epithelium and endothelium. Arch Ophthalmol 1980; 98: 1273–1288.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Glasser DB, Matsuda M, Ellis JG et al. Effects of intraocular irrigation solutions on the corneal endothelium after in vivo anterior chamber irrigation. Am J Ophthalmol 1985; 99: 321–328.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mishima S. Clinical investigations on the corneal endothelium (38th Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture). Am J Ophthalmol 1982; 93: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaufman HE, Capella JA, Robbins JE. The human corneal endothelium. Am J Ophthalmol 1966; 61: 835–841.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Amon M, Grasl M, Scheidel W et al. Bestimmung der präoperativen zentralen Endothelzelldichte von Spenderhornhäuten: Kritischer Vergleich zweier Methoden. Spektrum Augenheilkd 1988; 2(6): 245–248.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Khodadoust AA, Green K. Physiological function of regenerating endothelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1976; 15: 96–101.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Menapace R, Amon M, Radax U. Evaluation of 200 consecutive IOGEL 1103 bag-style lenses implanted through a small incision. J Cat Refract Surg (in press).

  15. Oxford Cataract Treatment and Evaluation Team. Long-term corneal endothelial cell loss after cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1986; 104: 1170–1175.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Levy JH, Pisacano AM. Endothelial cell loss in four types of intraocular lens implant procedures. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc 1985; 11: 465–468.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rao GN, Shaw EL, Arthur EJ et al. Endothelial cell morphology and corneal deturgescence. Ann Ophthalmol 1979; 11: 885–889.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Olsen T. Corneal thickness and endothelial damage after intracapsular cataract extraction. Acta Ophthalmol 1980; 58: 424–433.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martola EA, Baum JL. Central and peripheral corneal thickness. Arch Ophthalmol 1968; 79: 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sugar J, Mitchelson J, Kraff M. The effect of phacoemulsification on corneal endothelial cell density. Arch Ophthalmol 1978; 96: 446.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amon, M., Menapace, R., Radax, U. et al. Endothelial cell density and corneal pachometry after no-stitch, small-incision cataract surgery. Doc Ophthalmol 81, 301–307 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00161768

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00161768

Key words

Navigation