Abstract
We determined the magnitude of variability in optic disc topographical parameters on digital analysis of the optic disc using the IS 2000. The variability introduced by the system, the observer, the observer and patient, and by clinically different types of discs was assessed in the measurement of the vertical cup-to-disc ratio, horizontal cup-to-disc ratio, cup area-to-disc area, cup volume, neuroretinal rim area, and neuroretinal rim area-to-disc area. The system itself accounted for no variability. The variability introduced by one observer for the parameters ranged from 1% to 7%, and by one observer and patient from 1% to 28%. The variation among five observers ranged from 1% to 55%. Direct image acquisition (using video cameras) gave results that were no different from those obtained by digitizing the slides. Contrast-enhancement techniques did not decrease observer variability. A change in the flash intensity level at which optic disc images were acquired from 94.5 to 15.0 Watt-seconds introduced a variability of 3% to 21%. These results are less variable than those obtained on clinical observation and comparable to those of the Rodenstock image analyzer in evaluating these aspects of optic disc topography.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Caprioli J, Klingbeil U, Sears M, Pope B (1986) Reproducibility of optic disc measurements with computerized analysis of stereoscopic video images. Arch Ophthalmol 106: 1035–1039
Crock G (1970) Stereotechnology in medicine. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 90: 577–636
Fahnestock JD, Schowengerdt RA (1983) Spatially variant contrast enhancement using local range modification. Opt Eng 22: 378–381
Frisen L (1973) Resolution at low contrast with a fundus camera. Comparison of various photographic films. Invest Ophthalmol 12: 865–869
Jaeger E von (1854) Ueber Star und Staroperationen. Seidel, Wien, p 103
Kottler MS, Rosenthal AR, Falconer DG (1976) Digital photogrammetry of the optic nerve head. Invest Ophthalmol 13: 116–120
Leydhecker W, Kreiglestein GK, Collani EV (1979) Observer variation in applanation tonometry and estimation of the cup disc ratio. In: Krieglestein GK, Leydhecker W (eds) Glaucoma update. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 101–111
Lichter PR (1976) Variability of expert observers in evaluating the optic disc. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 74: 532–572
Mikelberg FS, Douglas GR, Schulzer M, Cornsweet TN, Wijsman K (1984) Reliability of optic disk topographic measurements recorded with a video-ophthalmograph. Am J Ophthalmol 98: 98–102
Pickard R (1923) A method recording disc alterations and a study of growth of normal and abnormal cups. Br J Ophthalmol 7: 81–90
Raye Norvelle F (1981) Interactive digital correlation techniques for automatic compilation of elevation data ETL-0272. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Topographic Laboratories, Fort Belvoir, Va.
Saheb NE, Drance SP, Nelson A (1972) The use of photogrammetry in evaluating the cup of the optic nerve head for a study in chronic simple glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol 7: 466–471
Takamoto T, Schwartz B (1980) Photogrammetric measurement of the optic disc cup in glaucoma. Int Arch Photogrammetry 23: 732–774
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Presented in part at ARVO, Sarasota, Florida on 5 May 1987; This work was supported in part by a Fight for Sight postdoctoral research fellowship grant, Fight for Sight, Inc., New York City
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Varma, R., Steinmann, W.C., Spaeth, G.L. et al. Variability in digital analysis of optic disc topography. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 226, 435–442 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02170004
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02170004