Skip to main content
Log in

Alpha factor analysis

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A distinction is made between statistical inference and psychometric inference in factor analysis. After reviewing Rao's canonical factor analysis (CFA), a fundamental statistical method of factoring, a new method of factor analysis based upon the psychometric concept of generalizability is described. This new procedure (alpha factor analysis, AFA) determines factors which have maximum generalizability in the Kuder-Richardson, or alpha, sense. The two methods, CFA and AFA, each have the important property of giving the same factors regardless of the units of measurement of the observable variables. In determining factors, the principal distinction between the two methods is that CFA operates in the metric of the unique parts of the observable variables while AFA operates in the metric of the common (“communality”) parts.

On the other hand, the two methods are substantially different as to how they establish the number of factors. CFA answers this crucial question with a statistical test of significance while AFA retains only those alpha factors with positive generalizability. This difference is discussed at some length. A brief outline of a computer program for AFA is described and an example of the application of AFA is given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, T. W. and Rubin, H. Statistical inference in factor analysis.Proc. third Berkeley Symp. math. Statist. and Prob., 1956,5, 11–50.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bargmann, R. A study of independence and dependence in multivariate normal analysis. Institute of Statistics, Univ. North Carolina, Mimeographed Series No. 186, 1957.

  3. Caffrey, J. Algorithm 66. INVRS.Communications of the ACM, 1961,4, 322.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cronbach, L. J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika, 1951,16, 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cronbach, L. J., Rajaratnam, N., and Gleser, G. C. Theory of generalizability: a liberalization of reliability theory.Brit. J. statist. Psychol., 1963,16, 137–163.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cronbach, L. J. and Hartmann, W. A note on negative reliabilities.Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1954,14, 342–346.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dickman, K. and Kaiser, H. F. Program for inverting a Gramian matrix.Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1961,21, 721–727.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guttman, L. A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability.Psychometrika, 1945,10, 255–282.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guttman, L. “Best possible” systematic estimates of communalities.Psychometrika, 1956,21, 273–286.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guttman, L. To what extent can communalities reduce rank?Psychometrika, 1958,23, 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harris, C. W. Some Rao-Guttman relationships.Psychometrika, 1962,27, 247–263.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Holzinger, K. J. and Harman, H.Factor analysis. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hotelling, H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components.J. educ. Psychol., 1933,24, 417–441, 498–520.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hoyt, C. Test reliability estimated by analysis of variance.Psychometrika, 1941,6, 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jackson, R. W. and Ferguson, G. A. Studies on the reliability of tests. Bulletin No. 12, Dept. of Educ. Res., Univ. Toronto, 1941.

  16. Kaiser, H. F. The varimax method of factor analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univ. Calif., 1956.

  17. Kaiser, H. F. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1958,23, 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kaiser, H. F. The application of electronic computers in factor analysis.Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1960,20, 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kaiser, H. F. Comments on communalities and the number of factors. Unpublished manuscript, 1960.

  20. Kuder, G. F. and Richardson, M. W. The theory of the estimation of test reliability.Psychometrika, 1937,2, 151–160.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lawley, D. N. The estimation of factor loadings by the method of maximum likelihood.Proc. roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 1940,60, 64–82.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lord, F. M. Some relations between Guttman's principal components of scale analysis and other psychometric theory.Psychometrika, 1958,23, 291–296.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rao, C. R. Estimation and tests of significance in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1955,20, 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thurstone, L. L.Multiple-factor analysis. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tryon, R. C. Reliability and behavior domain validity: Reformulation and historical critique.Psychol. Bull., 1957,54, 229–249.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The first version of this paper was prepared while the senior author was a U. S. Public Health Service Fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences and while the junior author was Director of Research of the Palo Alto Public Schools.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaiser, H.F., Caffrey, J. Alpha factor analysis. Psychometrika 30, 1–14 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289743

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289743

Keywords

Navigation