Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of health related quality of life and health state utility in patients with age related macular degeneration: the association of contrast sensitivity and visual acuity

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There has been increasing interest in the use of measures of health related quality of life (HRQoL) and health state utility values in Age Related Macular Degeneration (ARMD). Visual acuity has been found to be an important determinant of such measures in previous studies. More recently, another measure of visual impairment, contrast sensitivity has received considerable attention. We designed a study to examine whether the contribution of contrast sensitivity in explaining HRQoL and health utilities over and above that of visual acuity.

Methods

209 patients with unilateral or bilateral ARMD were recruited into a cross-sectional study of patients from a large teaching hospital. Patients underwent visual tests (near and distant visual acuity, contrast sensitivity) and completed a vision function questionnaire, the VF-14, HUI3, and time trade-off.

Results

Using multivariate regression analysis, the study revealed that contrast sensitivity remained a statistically significant predictor of all outcome measures even when visual acuity was included. This result was supported by the correlation coefficients between measures.

Conclusions

The measurement of contrast sensitivity appears to be better related to a person’s HRQoL and health utility. Future studies should consider incorporating contrast sensitivity in addition to visual acuity. Studies, in particular economic evaluations, may underestimate the effect of treatment unless contrast sensitivity is considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ARMD:

age related macular degeneration

CS:

contrast sensitivity

VA:

visual acuity

VF:

visual function

HUI:

health utilities index

HRQol:

health related quality of life

TTO:

time trade off

SG:

standard gamble

LogMAR:

logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution

References

  1. Meads C, Salas C, Roberts T, Moore D, Fry-Smith A, Hyde C (2003) Clinical effectiveness and cost-utility of photodynamic therapy for wet age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 7(9):v-vi,1–8

    Google Scholar 

  2. Evans J, Wormald R (1996) Is the incidence of registrable age-related macular degeneration increasing? Br J Ophthalmol. 80(1):9–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mones J, Rubin GS. Contrast sensitivity as an outcome measure in patients with subfoveal horoidal neovascularisation due to age-related macular degeneration. Eye 2004; 1–

  4. Rubin GS (1989) Assessment of visual function in eyes with visual loss. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2:357–67

    Google Scholar 

  5. Owsley C, Sekuler R, Boldt C (1981) Aging and low-contrast vision: face perception. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 21:362–65

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rubin GS, Bandeen–Roche K, Huang G-H, Munoz B, Schein OD, Fried LP, West SK (2001) The Association of Multiple Visual Impairments with Self-Reported Visual Disability: SEE Project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:64–1

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mackenzie PJ, Chang TS, Scott IU, Linder M, Hay D, Feuer WJ, Chambers K (2002) Assessment of vision-related function in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 109(4):720–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown GC, Sharma S, Brown MM, Kistler J (2000) Utility values and age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 118(1):47–1

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rubin GS, Bandeen-Roche K, Huang GH, Munoz B, Schein OD, Fried LP, West SK (2001) The association of multiple visual impairments with self-reported visual disability: SEE project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42(1):64–2

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bailey IL, Lovie JE (1980) The design and use of a new near-vision chart. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 57(6):378–87

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ (1988) The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vis Sci 2:187–99

    Google Scholar 

  12. Williams A (1995) The measurement and valuation of health: A chronicle. Discussion Paper 130. Centre for Health Economics, York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A (1996) Valuing health states: a comparison of methods. J Health Econ 15(2):209–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cassard SD, Patrick DL, Damiano AM, Legro MW, Tielsch JM, Diener-West M, Schein OD, Javitt JC, Bass EB, Steinberg EP (1995) Reproducibility and responsiveness of the VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataracts. Arch Ophthalmol 113:1508–513

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW, Goldsmith CH, Zhu Z, DePauw S, Denton M, Boyle M (2002) Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system. Med Care 40(2):113–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Espallargues M, Czoski-Murray CJ, Bansback NJ, Carlton J, Lewis GM, Hughes LA, Brand CS, Brazier JE (2005) The impact of age-related macular degeneration on health status utility values. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46(11):4016–023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Hillsdale, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rubin GS, Roche KB, Prasada-Rao P, Fried LP (1994) Visual impairment and disability in older adults. Optom Vis Sci 71:750–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Alexander MF, Maguire MG, Lietman TM, Snyder JR, Elman MJ, Fine SL (1988) Assessment of visual function in patients with age-related macular degeneration and low visual acuity. Arch Ophthalmol 106:1543–547

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leat SJ, Woodhouse JM (1993) Reading performance with low vision aids: relationship with contrast sensitivity. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 13:9–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Legge GE, Ross JA, Isenberg LM, LaMay JM (1992) Psychophysics of reading. Clinical predictors of low-vision reading speed. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33:677–87

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tejeria L, Harper RA, Artes PH, Dickinson CM (2002) Face recognition in age related macular degeneration: perceived disability, measured disability, and performance with a bioptic device. Br J Ophthalmol 86:1019–026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McClure ME, Hart PM, Jackson AJ, Stevenson MR, Chakravarthy U (2000) Macular degeneration: do conventional measurements of impaired visual function equate with visual disability? Br J Ophthalmol 84(3):244–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dolan P, Roberts J (2002) To what extent can we explain time trade-off values from other information about respondents? Soc Sci Med 54(6):919–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, Spritzer K, Berry S, Hays RD (2001) National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire Field Test Investigators. Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol 119(7):1050–058

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sharma S, Brown GC, Brown MM, Hollands H, Shah GK (2002) The cost-effectiveness of photodynamic therapy for fellow eyes with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 108:2051–059

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Novartis provided financial support for this project and Mireia Espallargues received a grant from the DURSI, Government of Catalonia to do this work. John Brazier is funded by the MRC Health Services Research Collaboration. Our appreciation to Professor Gary Rubin for his comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Bansback.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bansback, N., Czoski-Murray, C., Carlton, J. et al. Determinants of health related quality of life and health state utility in patients with age related macular degeneration: the association of contrast sensitivity and visual acuity. Qual Life Res 16, 533–543 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-9126-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-9126-8

Keywords

Navigation