Elsevier

Survey of Ophthalmology

Volume 28, Issue 2, September–October 1983, Pages 84-92
Survey of Ophthalmology

Review
Visual acuity norms in young children

https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6257(83)90076-0Get rights and content

Abstract

There are no universally accepted standards for visual acuity tests or norms in young (3–6-year-old) children, although acuity measurement is important in both clinical and screening settings. This review outlines the requirements for such standards. Although more research is needed, available data suggest that a standard test should meet the following requirements. It should utilize a letter optotype (tumbling E, Landolt C, or HOTV variant of the STYCAR), and single optotype with contour interaction bar surround. It should permit nonverbal pointing responses in younger children and verbal responses in older children. If an orientation-specifying method is followed, as with the E or Landolt C, the test should use a three-alternative choice—up, down, and sideways with a nondifferentiated left-right—rather than the traditional four alternative choice. A C-like O pseudo-optotype should be considered in a paired-comparison test format when the Landolt C is utilized, with a similar format for the tumbling E if a suitable pseudo-optotype can be derived. The optical grating test, which is widely used in infant testing, may underestimate acuity deficits and so is not a test of choice for determination of Snellen-equivalent acuity. A letter-based variant of the grating test may hold promise. Reduction in testing distance from 6 to 3 or 4 meters is recommended.

References (69)

  • J Stuart et al.

    A study of separation difficulty. Its relationship to visual acuity in normal and amblyopic eyes

    Am J Ophthalmol

    (1962)
  • DY Teller et al.

    Do preferential looking techniques underestimate infant visual acuity?

    Vis Res

    (1982)
  • JB Weiss

    Mesure de l'acuite visuelle du jeune infant

    Vis Res

    (1973)
  • GB Arden

    The importance of measuring contrast sensitivity in cases of visual disturbance

    Br J Ophthalmol

    (1978)
  • J Atkinson et al.

    ‘Preferential looking’ for monocular and binocular acuity testing of infants

    Br J Ophthalmol

    (1982)
  • J Atkinson et al.

    Contrast sensitivity function of preschool children

    Br J Ophthalmol

    (1981)
  • P Baraldi et al.

    Vision in the neonate (full-term and premature): Preliminary result of the application of some testing methods

    Ophthalmology

    (1981)
  • LD Beazley et al.

    Contrast sensitivity in children and adults

    Br J Ophthalmol

    (1980)
  • RT Blackhurst

    Successful preschool screening in Michigan

    J Mich State Med Soc

    (1962)
  • I Bodis-Wollner

    Detection of visual defects using the contrast sensitivity function

    Int Ophthalmol Clin

    (1980)
  • JC Brant et al.

    Testing of visual acuity in young children: An evaluation of some commonly used methods

    Develop Med Child Neurol

    (1976)
  • HM Burian et al.
  • NV Cairns et al.

    Young children's orientations of letters as a function of axis of symmetry and stimulus alignment

    Child Devel

    (1970)
  • FW Campbell et al.

    Monocular versus binocular visual acuity

    Nature

    (1965)
  • Committee on Vision et al.

    Recommended standard procedures for the clinical measurement and specification of visual acuity. Report of Working Group 39

    Adv Ophthal

    (1980)
  • V Dobson

    Behavioral tests of visual acuity in infants

    Int Ophthalmol Clin

    (1980)
  • V Dobson et al.

    Visual acuity screening of preterm infants

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (1980)
  • V Dobson et al.

    A behavioral method for efficient screening of visual acuity in young infants. I. Preliminary laboratory development

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (1978)
  • Editorial: Spatial contrast sensitivity revisited

    Br J Ophthalmol

    (1981)
  • Ehrlich MI, Reinecke RD, Simons K: Preschool vision screening for amblyopia and strabismus—Programs, methods,...
  • CA Eldred

    Judgements of right side up and figure rotation by young children

    Child Devel

    (1973)
  • MC Flom et al.

    Contour interaction and visual resolution: Contralateral effects

    Science

    (1963)
  • MC Flom et al.

    Visual resolution and contour interaction

    J Opt Soc Am

    (1963)
  • DS Friendly

    Preschool visual acuity screening tests

    Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol

    (1980)
  • Cited by (95)

    • Different trajectories in the development of visual acuity with different levels of crowding: The Milan Eye Chart (MEC)

      2019, Vision Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Nevertheless, no agreement between those measures is reported (Sailoganathan et al., 2018), confirming different sensitivity to crowding. Overall, there is currently no agreement to the best way to test VA in development that enables comparisons across different crowding conditions (Bailey & Lovie-Kitchin, 2013; Simons, 1983). Recently a new promising computerized tool with free access has been developed to assess acuity and crowding-limited size thresholds (Pelli et al., 2016).

    • The development of attentional resolution

      2014, Cognitive Development
      Citation Excerpt :

      This prerequisite was obviously met in our study, resulting in stable performance for all age groups. Constant dynamic visual acuity is quite conceivable given that basic functions thought to be underlying the dynamic visual acuity – static visual acuity (Nakatsuka et al., 2006) and visual pursuit (Uchida, Kudoh, Murakami, Honda, & Kitazawa, 2012) – have already reached maturity by school age (Mayer & Dobson, 1982; Rütsche, Baumann, Jiang, & Mojon, 2006; Schrauf et al., 1999; Simons, 1983; Skoczenski & Norcia, 2002). Besides the obvious difference in developmental patterns for dynamic visual acuity and attentional resolution, the independence of the two factors is statistically underpinned by a lack of correlation between the two tasks.

    • Timely Surgery in Intermittent Exotropia

      2023, Journal of Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported in part by Research Grant EY00752 from the National Eye Institute of the National Institutes of Health, and by the Research Division, Wills Eye Hospital.

    View full text