Mapping structural to functional damage in glaucoma with standard automated perimetry and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(99)80183-4Get rights and content

Purpose

To develop a quantitative method for analysis of the topographic relationship between structural and functional damage in patients with glaucoma.

Methods

We studied 26 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, focal optic disk damage, and focal visual field loss. The visual field was evaluated with automated perimetry, and the optic disk topography was assessed with a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Topographic measurements were calculated in 10-degree sectors and compared with a normative database (n = 52). The topographic relationship of structural damage and functional loss was analyzed.

Results

Rim area ratio was defined as the ratio of rim area in each 10-degree sector divided by the total rim area. This ratio resulted in the identification of one (46%) or more (54%) clusters of optic disk sectors as outside normal limits in all 26 patients (12 and 14 patients, respectively). Twenty-two patients (84%) with superior hemifield sensitivity loss tended to have inferior rim defects, and vice versa. Nasal visual field defects close to the horizontal midline were matched with damaged rim areas close to the vertical midline.

Conclusions

This mapping method allows an objective and quantitative evaluation of the optic disk and visual field in patients with glaucoma and focal damage. Although the topographic relationship between structure and function is characterized by considerable interindividual variability, the identification of certain patterns may be useful to aid in the evaluation of glaucomatous damage.

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (84)

  • Patient-attentive sequential strategy for perimetry-based visual field acquisition

    2019, Medical Image Analysis
    Citation Excerpt :

    Chong et al. (2014, 2016) leverage the spatial relations of individual locations to improve the overall accuracy of visual fields. These methods rely on the fact that anatomical structures and pathological factors are indicators of the co-dependency between values at different locations (Weber et al., 1990; Anton et al., 1998). While potentially more precise, these methods remain slow, as each location still needs to be evaluated.

  • Will Perimetry Be Performed to Monitor Glaucoma in 2025?

    2017, Ophthalmology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Structure and function measures also can be coanalyzed more easily as they are assimilated in hybrid instruments. Our understanding of the interrelation between structural and functional parameters continues to grow.50–52 In the future, algorithms likely will incorporate data from both structural and functional tests to provide a more robust understanding of glaucoma.53

View all citing articles on Scopus
*

Supported in part by National Eye Institute grants EY11008 (Dr Zangwill), EY08208 (Dr Sample), and EY11158 (Dr Weinreb); grant 95/5039 from the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias, Madrid, Spain (Dr Anton); a grant from the Foundation for Eye Research, Rancho Santa Fe, California (Dr Anton); and an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc, New York, New York.

View full text