Elsevier

Ophthalmology

Volume 110, Issue 8, August 2003, Pages 1593-1600
Ophthalmology

Persistently culture positive acanthamoeba keratitis: In vivo resistance and in vitro sensitivity

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00481-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

To characterize the risk factors, clinical course, treatment outcome and the association between in vivo resistance and in vitro sensitivity for subjects with persistently culture-positive Acanthamoeba keratitis.

Design

Retrospective noncomparative case series.

Participants

Eleven subjects with repeatedly positive cultures for Acanthamoeba treated between January 1990 and December 2000, were reviewed. Only subjects with 2 or more positive cultures, availability of the clinical data, and availability of the last Acanthamoeba isolate were included in this study.

Methods

The medical records were analyzed, and the last isolate from each case was tested in vitro for the antiamoebic drugs used clinically: polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB), chlorhexidine, propamidine and hexamidine.

Main outcome measures

Risk factors, the clinical outcome and in vitro cysticidal drug sensitivity assay.

Results

Eleven subjects (11/180, 6.1%) had 2 or more positive cultures of whom 8 eyes of 8 subjects (8/180, 4.45%) were included in this study. Seven of eight (87%) subjects were diagnosed over 1 month from onset (late diagnosis). The most common presenting findings were diffuse stromal infiltrate (5/8, 62.5%), ring infiltrate (5/8, 62.5%), and corneal ulceration (3/8, 37.5%). The clinical course of the disease in all subjects consisted of recurrent episodes of corneal and scleral inflammation, with a mean duration of 13.4 ± 9 months. All subjects received PHMB, and 5/8 (62.5%) chlorhexidine too; hexamidine was used in combination in 6/8 (75%), and propamidine in 1/8 (12.5%). All subjects had topical steroids, and 5/8 (62.5%) systemic immunosuppression. The disease resolved with corneal scarring in 3/8 (37.5%) subjects, corneal (or impending) perforation treated with therapeutic keratoplasty in 4/8 (50%), and enucleation in 1/8 (12.5%). Final visual acuity was 0.43 ± 0.37. In vitro most isolates were resistant to propamidine, hexamidine was cysticidal in high concentrations, and PHMB and chlorhexidine had excellent sensitivity profiles.

Conclusions

In our large series of Acanthamoeba keratitis with a positive microbiologic diagnosis at presentation, nearly 5% developed recurrent episodes of corneal and scleral inflammation with viable Acanthamoeba in the cornea despite prolonged treatment with biguanides and/or diamidines. There was no correlation between in vitro drug sensitivities and the in vivo response for biguanides.

Section snippets

Subjects

Between January 1990 and December 2000, there were 180 cases of culture-positive Acanthamoeba keratitis diagnosed at Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, U.K. All subjects with 2 or more positive corneal cultures for Acanthamoeba were identified from this database and included in the present study when both the clinical records and the last Acanthamoeba isolate were available. Ethics Committee approval was not required for this study.

The clinical records of these subjects were reviewed

Demographics, predisposing risk factors and presenting ocular findings

Eleven eyes of 11 subjects (11/180, 6.1%) with 2 or more positive corneal cultures were identified in the Moorfields Acanthamoeba database. In 8 (8/180, 4.45%) of them both the clinical data and the last Acanthamoeba isolate were available, and were included in the present study.

The mean age of the subjects was 36.38 ± 9.7 years (mean ± SD) with a range from 26 to 56 years. There was an equal number of men and women in the study group. Seven subjects had received ophthalmic treatment for a

Discussion

Despite the advent of modern effective therapy and improvements in diagnosis techniques in Acanthamoeba keratitis, a protracted clinical course with corneal and scleral inflammation still culminates in severe visual loss in some subjects.1 Several studies suggest that, in some subjects, persistent inflammation may be the result of an immune response to nonviable cysts whereas in others it is due to viable organisms remaining in the corneal tissue.1, 2, 6 Therefore, corneal infection by viable

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

Manuscript no. 220482.

This study was supported in part by the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, London, UK, and Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.

The authors have no proprietary interest in any of the materials described in this article.

View full text